Testicular cancer and electromagnetic fields (ENIF) in the workplace:: results of a population-based case-control study in Germany

被引:23
作者
Baumgardt-Elms, C
Ahrens, W
Bromen, K
Boikat, U
Stang, A
Jahn, I
Stegmaier, C
Jöckel, KH
机构
[1] Hamburg Canc Registry, D-22083 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Bremen Inst Prevent Res & Social Med, D-28359 Bremen, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Essen, Inst Med Informat Biometry & Epidemiol, D-45122 Essen, Germany
[4] Saarland Canc Registry, D-66119 Saarbrucken, Germany
关键词
case-control-studies; electromagnetic fields; radar; testicular cancer; workplace;
D O I
10.1023/A:1021999000651
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: In a population-based case-control study, we examined the association of testicular cancer and electromagnetic fields (EMF) in the workplace. Methods: Incident cases (n = 269) were recruited between 1995 and 1997. A total of 797 controls matched on age and region were randomly selected from mandatory registries of residents. EMF exposure was assessed for five categories in standardized face-to-face interviews using closed questions. For each exposure category, odds ratios (OR) were calculated, stratified by age and region, and in a more complex model weighted by duration and distance using conditional logistic regression. Subgroup analyses were conducted for seminoma and non-seminoma and for blue- and white-collar workers. Additionally, potential radar exposure was individually assessed by experts based on all available information including free text. Results: There was no excess risk for cases who reported to have ever worked near the following: radar units (OR = 1.0; 95% CI = 0.60-1.75); radiofrequency emitters (OR = 0.9; 95% CI = 0.60-1.24); electrical machines (OR = 1.0; 95% CI = 0.72-1.33); high-voltage lines or high-voltage electrical transmission installations (OR = 0.7; 95% CI = 0.38-1.18); or visual display units or complex electrical environments (OR = 0.9; 95% CI = 0.67-1.21). The results for the weighted exposure and subgroup analyses did not differ substantially. For radar exposure as assessed by the experts, the OR was 0.4 (95% CI = 0.13-1.16). Conclusions: EMF exposure in the workplace does not seem to be a relevant risk factor for testicular cancer in our study.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 902
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
AHRENS W, 1999, FORTSCHRITTE EPIDEMI
[2]   Increase in testicular cancer incidence in six European countries: A birth cohort phenomenon [J].
Bergstrom, R ;
Adami, HO ;
Mohner, M ;
Zatonski, W ;
Storm, H ;
Ekbom, A ;
Tretli, S ;
Teppo, L ;
Akre, O ;
Hakulinen, T .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1996, 88 (11) :727-733
[3]  
BRACKEN TD, 1993, AM IND HYG ASSOC J, V54, P165, DOI 10.1202/0002-8894(1993)054<0165:EAFPFE>2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]  
BRACKEN TD, 1991, P SCI WORKSH HLTH EF, P125
[6]   Epidemiology of testicular cancer [J].
Buetow, SA .
EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS, 1995, 17 (02) :433-449
[7]  
CHILVERS CED, 1994, BRIT J CANCER, V70, P513
[8]  
COLEMAN MP, 1993, IARC SCI PUBL, V121, P521
[9]   CLUSTER OF TESTICULAR CANCER IN POLICE OFFICERS EXPOSED TO HAND-HELD RADAR [J].
DAVIS, RL ;
MOSTOFI, FK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 1993, 24 (02) :231-233
[10]  
Finkelstein MM, 1998, AM J IND MED, V34, P157, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199808)34:2<157::AID-AJIM8>3.0.CO