Testicular cancer and electromagnetic fields (ENIF) in the workplace:: results of a population-based case-control study in Germany

被引:23
作者
Baumgardt-Elms, C
Ahrens, W
Bromen, K
Boikat, U
Stang, A
Jahn, I
Stegmaier, C
Jöckel, KH
机构
[1] Hamburg Canc Registry, D-22083 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Bremen Inst Prevent Res & Social Med, D-28359 Bremen, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Essen, Inst Med Informat Biometry & Epidemiol, D-45122 Essen, Germany
[4] Saarland Canc Registry, D-66119 Saarbrucken, Germany
关键词
case-control-studies; electromagnetic fields; radar; testicular cancer; workplace;
D O I
10.1023/A:1021999000651
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: In a population-based case-control study, we examined the association of testicular cancer and electromagnetic fields (EMF) in the workplace. Methods: Incident cases (n = 269) were recruited between 1995 and 1997. A total of 797 controls matched on age and region were randomly selected from mandatory registries of residents. EMF exposure was assessed for five categories in standardized face-to-face interviews using closed questions. For each exposure category, odds ratios (OR) were calculated, stratified by age and region, and in a more complex model weighted by duration and distance using conditional logistic regression. Subgroup analyses were conducted for seminoma and non-seminoma and for blue- and white-collar workers. Additionally, potential radar exposure was individually assessed by experts based on all available information including free text. Results: There was no excess risk for cases who reported to have ever worked near the following: radar units (OR = 1.0; 95% CI = 0.60-1.75); radiofrequency emitters (OR = 0.9; 95% CI = 0.60-1.24); electrical machines (OR = 1.0; 95% CI = 0.72-1.33); high-voltage lines or high-voltage electrical transmission installations (OR = 0.7; 95% CI = 0.38-1.18); or visual display units or complex electrical environments (OR = 0.9; 95% CI = 0.67-1.21). The results for the weighted exposure and subgroup analyses did not differ substantially. For radar exposure as assessed by the experts, the OR was 0.4 (95% CI = 0.13-1.16). Conclusions: EMF exposure in the workplace does not seem to be a relevant risk factor for testicular cancer in our study.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 902
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[41]   Occupational exposure to magnetic fields in relation to male breast cancer and testicular cancer: A Swedish case-control study [J].
Stenlund, C ;
Floderus, B .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 1997, 8 (02) :184-191
[42]  
SWERDLOW AJ, 1988, BRIT J IND MED, V45, P225
[43]  
SWERDLOW AJ, 1991, BRIT J IND MED, V48, P670
[44]   CANCER RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO MAGNETIC-FIELDS AMONG ELECTRIC UTILITY WORKERS IN ONTARIO AND QUEBEC, CANADA, AND FRANCE - 1970-1989 [J].
THERIAULT, G ;
GOLDBERG, M ;
MILLER, AB ;
ARMSTRONG, B ;
GUENEL, P ;
DEADMAN, J ;
IMBERNON, E ;
TO, T ;
CHEVALIER, A ;
CYR, D ;
WALL, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 139 (06) :550-572
[45]  
TORNQVIST S, 1986, BRIT J IND MED, V43, P212
[46]   INCIDENCE OF CANCER IN NORWEGIAN WORKERS POTENTIALLY EXPOSED TO ELECTROMAGNETIC-FIELDS [J].
TYNES, T ;
ANDERSEN, A ;
LANGMARK, F .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 136 (01) :81-88
[47]  
VANDENEEDEN SK, 1991, AM J IND MED, V19, P327