Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability

被引:262
作者
Blackstock, K. L. [1 ]
Kelly, G. J.
Horsey, B. L.
机构
[1] Macaulay Inst, Socioecon Res Programme, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, Scotland
[2] CSIRO Sustainable Ecosyst, Resource Futures Program, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
evaluation; participatory research; sustainability science; methodology; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; POLICY-MAKING; COMMUNITY; SYSTEMS; DELIBERATION; INVOLVEMENT; OUTCOMES; FEMINIST; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.014
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The normative implications of participatory research imply ongoing social learning that ought to lead to personal and institutional transformation. Sustainability science also requires reflexive scientific practice in order to enable the co-generation of solutions that take account of uncertainty and multiple forms of knowledge. However, there is little published peer-reviewed material on how to assess to what degree the rhetoric regarding the benefits of participatory research are achieved in practice, particularly with regard to participatory research for sustainability. This paper outlines how linking the rationales for participatory research and for sustainability science to the principles of evaluation can deliver a conceptually coherent evaluation framework for assessment. The approach for evaluating participatory research in this context consists of framing the evaluation, i.e., setting boundaries on the subject within its social, political, environmental and institutional context and selecting appropriate criteria, methods and data sources. The application of the framework, using a summative evaluation of participatory research for sustainability in north-east Australia, illustrates its strengths and weaknesses, concluding with a consideration of its applicability to further participatory sustainability science. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:726 / 742
页数:17
相关论文
共 90 条
  • [1] Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes
    Abelson, J
    Forest, PG
    Eyles, J
    Smith, P
    Martin, E
    Gauvin, FP
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2003, 57 (02) : 239 - 251
  • [2] Alston J.M., 1995, Science under Scarcity: Principles and Practice for Agricultural Research Evaluation and Priority Setting
  • [3] [Anonymous], NEA No. 5418
  • [4] [Anonymous], UTILIZATION FOCUSSED
  • [5] LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
    ARNSTEIN, SR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04): : 216 - 224
  • [6] Partnership working in public policy provision: A framework for evaluation
    Asthana, S
    Richardson, S
    Halliday, J
    [J]. SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 2002, 36 (07) : 780 - 795
  • [7] Balducci A., 1998, Participation and the Quality of Environmental Decision Making
  • [8] Making sustainable development evaluations work
    Becker, J
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 12 (04) : 200 - 211
  • [9] What are we gaining from stakeholder involvement? Observations from environmental planning in the Great Lakes
    Beierle, TC
    Konisky, DM
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2001, 19 (04): : 515 - 527
  • [10] A systems approach to the evaluation of natural resource management initiatives
    Bellamy, JA
    Walker, DH
    McDonald, GT
    Syme, GJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2001, 63 (04) : 407 - 423