Monte Carlo simulations of dose near a nonradioactive gold seed

被引:25
作者
Chow, James C. L.
Grigorov, Grigor N.
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON N2G 1G3, Canada
[2] Princess Margaret Hosp, Radiat Med Program, Toronto, ON N2G 1G3, Canada
[3] Univ Waterloo, Dept Phys, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[4] Grand River Hosp, Dept Phys Med, Grand River Reg Canc Ctr, Kitchener, ON N2G 1G3, Canada
关键词
Monte Carlo simulation; gold seed; prostate treatment planning; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; PROSTATE-CANCER; FIDUCIAL MARKERS; ORGAN MOTION; SETUP ERROR; ESCALATION; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1118/1.2388573
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
The relative doses and hot/cold spot positions around a non-radioactive gold seed, irradiated by a 6 or 18 MV photon beam in water, were calculated using Monte Carlo simulation. Phase space files of 6 and 18 MV photon beams with a field size of 1 X 1 cm 2 were generated by a Varian 21 EX linear accelerator using the EGSnrc and BEAMnrc code. The seed (1.2 x 1.2 x 3.2 mm(3)) was positioned at the isocenter in a water phantom (20 x 20 x 20 cm(2)) with source-to-axis distance =100 cm. For the single beam geometry, the relative doses (normalized to the dose at 5 mm distance above the isocenter) at the upstream seed surface were calculated to be 1.64 and 1.56 for the 6 and 18 MV beams respectively when the central beam axis (CAX) is parallel to the width of the seed. These doses were slightly higher than those (1.58 and 1.52 for 6 and 18 MV beams respectively) calculated when the CAX is perpendicular to the width of the seed. Compared to the relative dose profiles with the same beam geometry without the seed in the water phantom, the presence of the seed affects the dose distribution at about 3 mm distance beyond both the upstream and downstream seed surface. For a pair of opposing beams with equal and unequal beam weight, the hot and cold spots of both opposing beams were mixed. For a 360 degree photon arc around the longitudinal axis of the seed, the relative dose profile along the width of the seed was similar to that of the opposing beam pair, except the former geometry has a larger dose gradient near the seed surface. In this study, selected results from our simulation were compared to previous measurements using film dosimetry. (c) 2006 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:4614 / 4621
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1993, J ICRU
[2]
Dosimetric consequences of the application of off-line setup error correction protocols and a hull-volume definition strategy for intensity modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer [J].
Baum, C ;
Birkner, M ;
Alber, M ;
Paulsen, F ;
Nüsslin, F .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 76 (01) :35-42
[3]
Bielajew A.F., 1984, NUCL INSTRUM METH B, V88, P535
[4]
Experience of ultrasound-based daily prostate localization [J].
Chandra, A ;
Dong, L ;
Huang, E ;
Kuban, DA ;
O'Neill, L ;
Rosen, I ;
Pollack, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (02) :436-447
[5]
Optimization of collimator parameters to reduce rectal dose in intensity-modulated prostate treatment planning [J].
Chapek, J ;
Tobler, M ;
Toy, BJ ;
Lee, CM ;
Leavitt, DD .
MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2005, 30 (04) :205-212
[6]
Individualized planning target volumes for intrafraction motion during hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy boost for prostate cancer [J].
Cheung, P ;
Sixel, K ;
Morton, G ;
Loblaw, DA ;
Tirona, R ;
Pang, G ;
Choo, R ;
Szumacher, E ;
DeBoer, G ;
Pignol, JP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 62 (02) :418-425
[7]
Dose measurements near a non-radioactive gold seed using radiographic film [J].
Chow, JCL ;
Grigorov, GN .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (18) :N227-N234
[8]
On-line aSi portal imaging of implanted fiducial markers for the reduction of interfraction error during conformal radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma [J].
Chung, PWM ;
Haycocks, T ;
Brown, T ;
Cambridge, Z ;
Kelly, V ;
Alasti, H ;
Jaffray, DA ;
Catton, CN .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (01) :329-334
[9]
Impact of geometric uncertainties on evaluation of treatment techniques for prostate cancer [J].
Craig, T ;
Wong, E ;
Bauman, G ;
Battista, J ;
Van Dyk, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 62 (02) :426-436
[10]
PROSTATE MOTION DURING STANDARD RADIOTHERAPY AS ASSESSED BY FIDUCIAL MARKERS [J].
CROOK, JM ;
RAYMOND, Y ;
SALHANI, D ;
YANG, H ;
ESCHE, B .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1995, 37 (01) :35-42