Degradation of cellulose substrates by cellulosome chimeras -: Substrate targeting versus proximity of enzyme components

被引:232
作者
Fierobe, HP [1 ]
Bayer, EA
Tardif, C
Czjzek, M
Mechaly, A
Bélaïch, A
Lamed, R
Shoham, Y
Bélaïch, JP
机构
[1] CNRS, IBSM, IFR1, Bioenerget & Ingn Prot, F-13402 Marseille, France
[2] Weizmann Inst Sci, Dept Biol Chem, IL-76100 Rehovot, Israel
[3] Univ Aix Marseille 1, F-13331 Marseille, France
[4] CNRS, IBSM, Architecture Fonctionnelle Macromol, F-13402 Marseille, France
[5] Tel Aviv Univ, Dept Mol Microbiol & Biotechnol, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[6] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Dept Food Engn & Biotechnol, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel
[7] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Inst Catalysis Sci & Technol, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel
关键词
D O I
10.1074/jbc.M207672200
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A library of 75 different chimeric cellulosomes was constructed as an extension of our previously described approach for the production of model functional complexes (Fierobe, H.-P., Mechaly, A., Tardif, C., Belaich, A., Lamed, R., Shoham, Y., Belaich, J.-P., and Bayer, E. A (2001) J. BioL Chem. 276,21257-21261), based on the high affinity species-specific cohesin-dockerin interaction. Each complex contained three protein components: (i) a chimeric scaffoldin possessing an optional cellulose-binding module and two cohesins of divergent specificity, and (ii) two cellulases, each bearing a dockerin complementary to one of the divergent cohesins. The activities of the resultant ternary complexes were assayed using different types of cellulose substrates. Organization of cellulolytic enzymes into cellulosome chimeras resulted in characteristically high activities on recalcitrant substrates, whereas the cellulosome chimeras showed little or no advantage over free enzyme systems on tractable substrates. On recalcitrant cellulose, the presence of a cellulose-binding domain on the scaffoldin and enzyme proximity on the resultant complex contributed almost equally to their elevated action on the substrate. For certain enzyme pairs, however, one effect appeared to predominate over the other. The results also indicate that substrate recalcitrance is not necessarily a function of its crystallinity but reflects the overall accessibility of reactive sites.
引用
收藏
页码:49621 / 49630
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Atalla R.H., 1999, Comprehensive Natural Products Chemistry, P529
[2]   THE CELLULOSOME - A TREASURE-TROVE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY [J].
BAYER, EA ;
MORAG, E ;
LAMED, R .
TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1994, 12 (09) :379-386
[3]   Cellulosomes - Structure and ultrastructure [J].
Bayer, EA ;
Shimon, LJW ;
Shoham, Y ;
Lamed, R .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 1998, 124 (2-3) :221-234
[4]   Cellulose, cellulases and cellulosomes [J].
Bayer, EA ;
Chanzy, H ;
Lamed, R ;
Shoham, Y .
CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 1998, 8 (05) :548-557
[5]  
BAYER EA, 2000, PROKARYOTES EVOLVING
[6]   The cellulosome: An exocellular, multiprotein complex specialized in cellulose degradation [J].
Beguin, P ;
Lemaire, M .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1996, 31 (03) :201-236
[7]   The cellulolytic system of Clostridium cellulolyticum [J].
Belaich, JP ;
Tardif, C ;
Belaich, A ;
Gaudin, C .
JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1997, 57 (1-3) :3-14
[8]   Feruloyl esterase activity of the Clostridium thermocellum cellulosome can be attributed to previously unknown domains of XynY and XynZ [J].
Blum, DL ;
Kataeva, IA ;
Li, XL ;
Ljungdahl, LG .
JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 2000, 182 (05) :1346-1351
[9]   Imaging the enzymatic digestion of bacterial cellulose ribbons reveals the endo character of the cellobiohydrolase Cel6A from Humicola insolens and its mode of synergy with cellobiohydrolase Cel7A [J].
Boisset, C ;
Fraschini, C ;
Schülein, M ;
Henrissat, B ;
Chanzy, H .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 66 (04) :1444-1452
[10]   Digestion of crystalline cellulose substrates by the Clostridium thermocellum cellulosome:: structural and morphological aspects [J].
Boisset, C ;
Chanzy, H ;
Henrissat, B ;
Lamed, R ;
Shoham, Y ;
Bayer, EA .
BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 340 :829-835