Measuring and improving quality in emergency medicine

被引:42
作者
Graff, L
Stevens, C
Spaite, D
Foody, J
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Sch Med, Dept Traumatol & Emergency Med, Sect Emergency Med, Farmington, CT USA
[2] Harbor UCLA Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Emergency Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Sch Med, Arizona Emergency Med Res Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Tucson, AZ USA
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Sect Cardiovasc Med, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[5] Qualidigm, Middletown, CT USA
关键词
quality improvement; emergency medicine; vulnerable populations;
D O I
10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01563.x
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The findings are presented of a consensus committee created to address the measuring and improving of quality in emergency medicine. The objective of the committee was to critically evaluate how quality in emergency medicine can be measured and how quality improvement projects can positively affect the care of emergency patients. Medical quality is defined as "the care health professionals would want to receive if they got sick." The literature of quality improvement in emergency medicine is reviewed and analyzed. A summary list of measures of quality is included with four categories: condition-specific diseases, diagnostic syndromes, tasks/procedures, and department efficiency/efficacy. Methods and tools for quantifying these measures are examined as well as their accuracy in assessing quality and adjusting for differences in environment, and patient populations. Successful strategies for changing physician behavior are detailed as well as barriers to change. Examples are given of successful quality improvement efforts. Also examined is how to address the emergency care needs of vulnerable populations such as older persons, women, those without health insurance, and ethnic minorities.
引用
收藏
页码:1091 / 1107
页数:17
相关论文
共 95 条
[11]  
BERWICK DM, 1999, REDUCING WAITS DELAY
[12]   Recent findings on preventable hospitalizations [J].
Billings, J ;
Anderson, GM ;
Newman, LS .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 1996, 15 (03) :239-249
[13]   CONSEQUENCES OF QUEUING FOR CARE AT A PUBLIC HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT [J].
BINDMAN, AB ;
GRUMBACH, K ;
KEANE, D ;
RAUCH, L ;
LUCE, JM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 266 (08) :1091-1096
[14]   PATIENTS PERCEPTIONS OF THE HEALTH-CARE RECEIVED IN AN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT [J].
BJORVELL, H ;
STIEG, J .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1991, 20 (07) :734-738
[15]  
Bopp K D, 1990, J Health Care Mark, V10, P6
[16]   A qualitative study of increasing β-blocker use after myocardial infarction -: Why do some hospitals succeed? [J].
Bradley, EH ;
Holmboe, ES ;
Mattera, JA ;
Roumanis, SA ;
Radford, MJ ;
Krumholz, HM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (20) :2604-2611
[17]   QUALITY - CAN WE MEASURE IT [J].
BROOK, RH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1977, 296 (03) :170-172
[18]   EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT SATISFACTION - WHAT MATTERS MOST [J].
BURSCH, B ;
BEEZY, J ;
SHAW, R .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1993, 22 (03) :586-591
[19]  
Carey RG., 1995, MEASURING QUALITY IM
[20]   RACIAL AND ETHNIC-DIFFERENCES IN THE USE OF INVASIVE CARDIAC PROCEDURES AMONG CARDIAC PATIENTS IN LOS-ANGELES-COUNTY, 1986 THROUGH 1988 [J].
CARLISLE, DM ;
LEAKE, BD ;
SHAPIRO, MF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1995, 85 (03) :352-356