Communicating Directionality in Flying Robots

被引:140
作者
Szafir, Daniel [1 ]
Mutlu, Bilge [1 ]
Fong, Terrence [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, 1210 W Dayton St, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] NASA, Ames Res Ctr, Moffett Field, CA 94035 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI'15) | 2015年
关键词
Robot design; signaling intent; free-flyers; micro air vehicles (MAVs); VISUAL-PERCEPTION; TIMES;
D O I
10.1145/2696454.2696475
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Small flying robots represent a rapidly emerging family of robotic technologies with aerial capabilities that enable unique forms of assistance in a variety of collaborative tasks. Such tasks will necessitate interaction with humans in close proximity, requiring that designers consider human perceptions regarding robots flying and acting within human environments. We explore the design space regarding explicit robot communication of flight intentions to nearby viewers. We apply design constraints to robot flight behaviors, using biological and airplane flight as inspiration, and develop a set of signaling mechanisms for visually communicating directionality while operating under such constraints. We implement our designs on two commercial flyers, requiring little modification to the base platforms, and evaluate each signaling mechanism, as well as a no-signaling baseline, in a user study in which participants were asked to predict robot intent. We found that three of our designs significantly improved viewer response time and accuracy over the baseline and that the form of the signal offered tradeoffs in precision, generalizability, and perceived robot usability.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 26
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[21]   Six-and-a-half-month-old children positively attribute goals to human action and to humanoid-robot motion [J].
Kamewari, K ;
Kato, M ;
Kanda, T ;
Ishiguro, H ;
Hiraki, K .
COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 20 (02) :303-320
[22]  
Kidokoro H, 2013, ACMIEEE INT CONF HUM, P259, DOI 10.1109/HRI.2013.6483597
[23]  
Kirby Rachel, 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, P607, DOI 10.1109/ROMAN.2009.5326271
[24]  
Mutlu B., 2006, Designing Interactive Systems. DIS2006, P251
[25]  
Nehaniv CL, 2005, 2005 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION (RO-MAN), P371
[26]  
Norman D. A., 1999, Interactions, V6, P38, DOI 10.1145/301153.301168
[27]  
Norman D.A., 1986, Cognitive engineering
[28]   Situational Context Directs How People Affectively Interpret Robotic Non-Linguistic Utterances [J].
Read, Robin ;
Belpaeme, Tony .
HRI'14: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2014 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION, 2014, :41-48
[29]  
Riordan-Eva P., 2011, VAUGHAN ASBURYS GEN, p18e
[30]  
Runeson Sverker., 1983, VISUAL PERCEPTION DY