Do termination provisions truncate the takeover bidding process?

被引:55
作者
Boone, Audra L.
Mulherin, J. Harold
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Sch Business, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/rfs/hhl009
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We provide new evidence on termination provisions and the takeover bidding process. Our central contribution is a novel database from Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) documents that accurately measures the incidence of termination provisions and the depth of competition in takeover deals. We show that biased data in prior research produced incorrect conclusions on the relation between termination provisions and judicial decisions, bidder toeholds, and deal size. Our comprehensive data also show that termination provisions are positively related to takeover competition. Our evidence is consistent with the information/commitment hypothesis in which termination provisions do not truncate bidding but instead culminate the takeover process.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 489
页数:29
相关论文
共 40 条
[2]  
BAINBRIDGE SM, 1990, MINN LAW REV, V75, P239
[3]   Breaking up is hard to do? An analysis of termination fee provisions and merger outcomes [J].
Bates, TW ;
Lemmon, ML .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 69 (03) :469-504
[4]   THE CASE FOR FACILITATING COMPETING TENDER OFFERS [J].
BEBCHUK, LA .
HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 1982, 95 (05) :1028-1056
[5]  
BERKOVITCH E, 1989, J LAW ECON ORGAN, V5, P395
[6]   HOW TARGET SHAREHOLDERS BENEFIT FROM VALUE-REDUCING DEFENSIVE STRATEGIES IN TAKEOVERS [J].
BERKOVITCH, E ;
KHANNA, N .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1990, 45 (01) :137-156
[7]  
BETTON S, 2005, TOEHOLD PUZZLE
[8]  
BOONE A, 2006, IN PRESS J FINANCE
[9]  
Bulow J, 1996, AM ECON REV, V86, P180
[10]   Locking out rival bidders: The use of lockup options in corporate mergers [J].
Burch, TR .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 60 (01) :103-141