Comparative evaluation of 2D time-of-flight and 3D elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR venography in patients with presumptive cerebral venous and sinus thrombosis

被引:46
作者
Klingebiel, R.
Bauknecht, H. C.
Bohner, G.
Kirsch, R.
Berger, J.
Masuhr, F.
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Berlin, Charite, Dept Radiol, Neuroradiol Sect, Berlin, Germany
[2] Siemens AG, Med Solut, D-8520 Erlangen, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Berlin, Charite, Dept Neurol, Berlin, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Berlin, Charite, Ctr Stroke Res, Berlin, Germany
关键词
cerebral venous and sinus thrombosis; magnetic resonance imaging; venography;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01574.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
We retrospectively evaluated an elliptic centric ordered 3D (ec 3D) magnetic resonance venography (MRV) technique in comparison to 2D time-of-flight (2D TOF) MRV in patients with presumptive cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). Twenty-five patients (mean age 40.6 +/- 16.5 years) with presumptive CVST underwent cerebral MRI including 2D TOF and ec 3D MRV. Radiologic findings and clinical outcome were correlated. MRV studies were evaluated by two neuroradiologists in a blinded manner for image quality, assessment of various sinus, internal cerebral veins (ICV), vein of Labbe and Galen (VL/VG) as well as for additional imaging procedures required. Sensitivity/specificity of ec 3D MRV amounted to 85.7%/97.2% as compared with 2D TOF 71.4%/55.6 %. Ec 3D MRV performed superior in terms of image quality as well as assessment of all sinus and veins except for the straight sinus. Additional imaging procedures were less often required in ec 3D MRV studies (28% vs. 66% for 2D TOF MRV; P < 0.001). Interobserver agreement was significantly increased by using ec 3D MRV (93.1% vs. 70.9% of readings). The results of our study provide additional evidence for the superiority of ec 3D compared with 2D TOF MR venography for the diagnosis or exclusion of acute CVST in daily clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 143
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]
CEREBRAL VENOUS THROMBOSIS [J].
AMERI, A ;
BOUSSER, MG .
NEUROLOGIC CLINICS, 1992, 10 (01) :87-111
[2]
Ayanzen RH, 2000, AM J NEURORADIOL, V21, P74
[3]
DORMONT D, 1995, AM J NEURORADIOL, V16, P1347
[4]
Intracranial venous system: Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR venography with auto-trigered elliptic centric-ordered sequence - Initial experience [J].
Farb, RI ;
Scott, JN ;
Willinsky, RA ;
Montanera, W ;
Wright, GA ;
terBrugge, KG .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 226 (01) :203-209
[5]
Comparison of different MR venography techniques for detecting transverse sinus stenosis in idiopathic intracranial hypertension [J].
Fera, F ;
Bono, F ;
Messina, D ;
Gallo, O ;
Lanza, PL ;
Auteri, W ;
Nicoletti, G ;
Santoro, G ;
Quattrone, A .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2005, 252 (09) :1021-1025
[6]
More reliable noninvasive visualization of the cerebral veins and dural sinuses: Comparison of three MR angiographic techniques [J].
Kirchhof, K ;
Welzel, T ;
Jansen, O ;
Sartor, K .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (03) :804-810
[7]
Preoperative evaluation of venous systems with 3-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography in brain tumors: comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance venography and digital subtraction angiography [J].
Lee, JM ;
Jung, S ;
Moon, KS ;
Seo, JJ ;
Kim, IY ;
Jung, TY ;
Lee, JK ;
Kang, SS .
SURGICAL NEUROLOGY, 2005, 64 (02) :128-134
[8]
Cerebral venous and sinus thrombosis [J].
Masuhr, E ;
Mehraein, S ;
Einhäupl, K .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2004, 251 (01) :11-23
[9]
Three-dimensional venography of the brain with a volumetric interpolated sequence [J].
Mermuys, KP ;
Vanhoenacker, PK ;
Chappel, P ;
Van Hoe, L .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 234 (03) :901-908
[10]
Imaging of the intracranial venous system with a contrast-enhanced volumetric interpolated examination [J].
Wetzel, SG ;
Law, M ;
Lee, VS ;
Cha, S ;
Johnson, G ;
Nelson, K .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (05) :1010-1018