Effect of CAD on Radiologists' Detection of Lung Nodules on Thoracic CT Scans: Analysis of an Observer Performance Study by Nodule Size

被引:158
作者
Sahiner, Berkman [1 ]
Chan, Heang-Ping [1 ]
Hadjiiski, Lubomir M. [1 ]
Cascade, Philip N. [1 ]
Kazerooni, Ella A. [1 ]
Chughtai, Aamer R. [1 ]
Poopat, Chad [2 ]
Song, Thomas [2 ]
Frank, Luba [1 ]
Stojanovska, Jadranka [1 ]
Attili, Anil [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Henry Ford Hosp, Dept Radiol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
关键词
Lung Nodule; CT; computer-aided detection; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; IMAGE DATABASE CONSORTIUM; SMALL PULMONARY NODULES; SPIRAL CT; DIAGNOSIS SYSTEM; CANCER; TOMOGRAPHY; LOCALIZATION; MAMMOGRAPHY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2009.08.006
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. To retrospectively investigate the effect of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system on radiologists' performance for detecting small pulmonary nodules in computed tomography (CT) examinations, with a panel of expert radiologists serving as the reference standard. Materials and Methods. Institutional review board approval wits obtained. Our dataset contained 52 CT examinations collected by the Lung Image Database Consortium, and 33 from our institution. All CTs were read by multiple expert thoracic radiologists 7 to identify the reference standard for detection. Six other thoracic radiologists read the CT examinations first without and then with CAD. Performance was evaluated using free-response receiver operating characteristics (FROC) and the jackknife FROC analysis methods (JAFROC) for nodules above different diameter thresholds. Results. A total of 241 nodules, ranging in size from 3.0 to 18.6 mm (mean, 5.3 mm) were identified as the reference standard. At diameter thresholds of 3, 4, 5, and 6 mm the CAD system had it sensitivity of 54%. 64%, 68%, and 76%, respectively, with an average of 5.6 false positives (FPs) per scan. Without CAD, the average figures of merit (FOMs) for the six radiologists, obtained from JAFROC analysis, were 0.661, 0.729, 0.793, and 0.838 for the same nodule diameter thresholds, respectively. With CAD, the corresponding average FOMs improved to 0.705, 0.763, 0.810, and 0.862, respectively. The improvement achieved statistical significance for nodules at the 3 and 4 mm thresholds (P =.002 and .020, respectively). and did not achieve significance at 5 and 6 mm (P =. 18 and .13, respectively). At a nodule diameter threshold of 3 mm, the radiologists' average sensitivity and FP rate were 0.56 and 0.67, respectively, without CAD, and 0.671 and 0.78 with CAD. Conclusion. CAD improves thoracic radiologists' performance for detecting pulmonary nodules smaller than 5 mm on CT examinations, which are often overlooked by visual inspection alone.
引用
收藏
页码:1518 / 1530
页数:13
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]
Evaluation of automated lung nodule detection on low-dose computed tomography scans from a lung cancer screening program [J].
Armato, SG ;
Roy, AS ;
MacMahon, H ;
Li, F ;
Doi, K ;
Sone, S ;
Altman, MB .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2005, 12 (03) :337-346
[2]
Lung image database consortium: Developing a resource for the medical imaging research community [J].
Armato, SG ;
McLennan, G ;
McNitt-Gray, MF ;
Meyer, CR ;
Yankelevitz, D ;
Aberle, DR ;
Henschke, CI ;
Hoffman, EA ;
Kazerooni, EA ;
MacMahon, H ;
Reeves, AP ;
Croft, BY ;
Clarke, LP .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 232 (03) :739-748
[3]
Pulmonary nodules at chest CT: Effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologists' detection performance [J].
Awai, K ;
Murao, K ;
Ozawa, A ;
Komi, M ;
Hayakawa, H ;
Hori, S ;
Nishimura, Y .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (02) :347-352
[4]
Computed tomography screening and lung cancer outcomes [J].
Bach, Peter B. ;
Jett, James R. ;
Pastorino, Ugo ;
Tockman, Melvyn S. ;
Swensen, Stephen J. ;
Begg, Colin B. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 297 (09) :953-961
[5]
Pulmonary nodules: Automated detection on CT images with morphologic matching algorithm preliminary results [J].
Bae, KT ;
Kim, JS ;
Na, YH ;
Kim, KG ;
Kim, JH .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 236 (01) :286-294
[6]
CAD systems for mammography: A real opportunity? A review of the literature [J].
Bazzocchi M. ;
Mazzarella F. ;
Del Frate C. ;
Girometti F. ;
Zuiani C. .
La radiologia medica, 2007, 112 (3) :329-353
[7]
Tradeoffs in noise, resolution, and dose with reconstruction filter in lung nodule detection in CT [J].
Boedeker, KL ;
McNitt-Gray, MF .
Medical Imaging 2005: Physics of Medical Imaging, Pts 1 and 2, 2005, 5745 :695-703
[8]
Computer-aided lung nodule detection in CT: Results of large-scale observer test [J].
Brown, MS ;
Goldin, JG ;
Rogers, S ;
Kim, HJ ;
Suh, RD ;
McNitt-Gray, MF ;
Shah, SK ;
Truong, D ;
Brown, K ;
Sayre, JW ;
Gjertson, DW ;
Batra, P ;
Aberle, DR .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2005, 12 (06) :681-686
[9]
Lung micronodules: Automated method for detection at thin-section CT - Initial experience [J].
Brown, MS ;
Goldin, JG ;
Suh, RD ;
McNitt-Gray, MF ;
Sayre, JW ;
Aberle, DR .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 226 (01) :256-262
[10]
PULMONARY NODULES - EFFECT OF INCREASED DATA SAMPLING ON DETECTION WITH SPIRAL CT AND CONFIDENCE IN DIAGNOSIS [J].
BUCKLEY, JA ;
SCOTT, WW ;
SIEGELMAN, SS ;
KUHLMAN, JE ;
URBAN, BA ;
BLUEMKE, DA ;
FISHMAN, EK .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 196 (02) :395-400