Effects of luminance and resolution on observer performance with chest radiographs

被引:53
作者
Herron, JM
Bender, TM
Campbell, WL
Sumkin, JH
Rockette, HE
Gur, D
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
关键词
diagnostic radiology; observer performance; images; display; lung; diseases; neoplasms; pneumothorax; ribs; fracture;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap34169
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To examine the combined effects of image resolution and display luminance on observer performance for detection of abnormalities depicted on posteroanterior chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 529 radiographs were displayed on a specially constructed view box at three luminance levels (770, 260, and 85 cd/m(2)) and three resolutions (100-mu m, 200-mu m, and 400-mu m pixels). Each image was reviewed nine times by six radiologists who participated in this study. The abnormalities included nodule, pneumothorax, interstitial disease, alveolar infiltrates, and rib fracture. Negative (normal) radiographs were also included. REULTS: Receiver operating characteristic curves indicated that the effect of image luminance was greater than that of resolution. The detection of pneumothorax, interstitial disease, and rib fracture showed statistically significant differences (P < .05) due to luminance. The detection of pneumothorax was the only abnormality with a statistically significant difference due to resolution. There was no evidence that luminance was related to image resolution for any of the abnormalities. CONCLUSION: At a resolution of 400-mu m pixels or higher across the field of view and a luminance of 260 cd/m(2) or more, primary diagnosis with posteroanterior chest radiographs is not likely to be affected by the quality of display.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 174
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   LIGHTNESS, BRIGHTNESS, AND BRIGHTNESS CONTRAST .1. ILLUMINANCE VARIATION [J].
AREND, LE ;
SPEHAR, B .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1993, 54 (04) :446-456
[2]  
BARTEN PGJ, 1992, SPIE P, V1666, P57
[3]  
BLUME H, 1990, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V1232, P97, DOI 10.1117/12.18846
[4]  
BRITTON CA, 1990, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V1234, P94, DOI 10.1117/12.18948
[5]   Comparison of a cathode-ray-tube and film for display of computed radiographic images [J].
Cook, LT ;
Cox, GG ;
Insana, MF ;
McFadden, MA ;
Hall, TJ ;
Gaborski, RS ;
Lure, FYM .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (07) :1132-1138
[6]   Observer performance assessment of JPEG-compressed high-resolution chest images [J].
Good, WF ;
Maitz, G ;
King, J ;
Gennari, R ;
Gur, D .
MEDICAL IMAGING 1999: IMAGE PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1999, 3663 :8-13
[7]   A METHOD OF COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES DERIVED FROM THE SAME CASES [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1983, 148 (03) :839-843
[8]   THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) :29-36
[9]  
HERRON JM, 1995, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V2431, P526, DOI 10.1117/12.207649
[10]   Effects of ambient light and view box luminance on the detection of calcifications in mammography [J].
KimmeSmith, C ;
Haus, AG ;
DeBruhl, N ;
Bassett, LW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (03) :775-778