Selecting Measures for Balance and Mobility to Improve Assessment and Treatment of Individuals After Stroke

被引：11

作者：

Kegelmeyer, Deb A. ^{[1
]}

Kloos, Anne D. ^{[1
]}

Siles, Amelia B. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Ohio State Univ, Div Phys Therapy, Coll Med, Columbus, OH 43210 USA

来源：

TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION | 2014年 / 21卷 / 04期

关键词：

assessment; outcome measure; stroke; test(s); FUGL-MEYER ASSESSMENT; LOWER-EXTREMITY; REHABILITATION ASSESSMENT; INPATIENT REHABILITATION; REFERENCE VALUES; ASSESSMENT SCALE; IMPACT SCALE; GAIT SPEED; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE;

D O I：

10.1310/tsr2104-303

中图分类号：

R49 [康复医学];

学科分类号：

100215 ;

摘要：

Assessment of individuals with stroke using reliable and valid outcome measures is a key component of the treatment planning process. Health care professionals may have difficulty selecting balance and mobility measures given the large number of measures to choose from. This article utilizes a case-based approach to describe the benefits of using a common set of outcome measures and a process for selecting optimal measures across body structure/function, activity, and participation domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model and stages of stroke recovery. Specific measures for use in acute care, rehabilitation, outpatient, and home health care settings are discussed based on StrokEDGE task force recommendations by the Neurology Section of the American Physical Therapy Association.

引用

页码：303 / 315

页数：13

共 41 条

[1]

Beckerman H, 1996, SCAND J REHABIL MED, V28, P3

[2] Validation of a standardized assessment of postural control in stroke patients -: The Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke patients (PASS) [J].

Benaim, C ;

Pérennou, DA ;

Villy, J ;

Rousseaux, M ;

Pelissier, JY .

STROKE, 1999, 30 (09) :1862-1868

[3] Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke [J].

Beninato, M ;

Gill-Body, KM ;

Salles, S ;

Stark, PC ;

Black-Schaffer, RM ;

Stein, J .

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2006, 87 (01) :32-39

[4]

BERG KO, 1992, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V73, P1073

[5] IS GAIT SPEED OR WALKING DISTANCE A BETTER PREDICTOR FOR COMMUNITY WALKING AFTER STROKE? [J].

Bijleveld-Uitman, Merel ;

van de Port, Ingrid ;

Kwakkel, Gert .

JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2013, 45 (06) :535-540

[6] Reference values for the five-repetition sit-to-stand test: A descriptive meta-analysis of data from elders [J].

Bohannon, Richard W. .

PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 2006, 103 (01) :215-222

[7] Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: Reference values and determinants [J].

Bohannon, RW .

AGE AND AGEING, 1997, 26 (01) :15-19

[8] Validation of a Speed-Based Classification System Using Quantitative Measures of Walking Performance Poststroke [J].

Bowden, Mark G. ;

Balasubramanian, Chitralakshmi K. ;

Behrman, Andrea L. ;

Kautz, Steven A. .

NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2008, 22 (06) :672-675

[9] Goal achievement in the six months after inpatient rehabilitation for stroke [J].

Brock, Kim ;

Black, Susan ;

Cotton, Sue ;

Kennedy, Genevieve ;

Wilson, Sue ;

Sutton, Emma .

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2009, 31 (11) :880-886

[10] Ability of Functional Independence Measure to accurately predict functional outcome of stroke-specific population: Systematic review [J].

Chumney, Douglas ;

Nollinger, Kristen ;

Shesko, Kristina ;

Skop, Karen ;

Spencer, Madeleine ;

Newton, Roberta A. .

JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 47 (01) :17-29

← 1 2 3 4 5 →