In vitro versus in vivo cellulose microfibrils from plant primary wall synthases:: Structural differences

被引:117
作者
Lai-Kee-Him, J
Chanzy, H
Müller, M
Putaux, JL
Imai, T
Bulone, V
机构
[1] Univ Grenoble 1, Ctr Rech Macromol Vegetales, CERMAV, UPR 5301,CNRS, F-38041 Grenoble 9, France
[2] European Synchrotron Radiat Facil, F-38043 Grenoble, France
关键词
D O I
10.1074/jbc.M203530200
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Detergent extracts of microsomal fractions from suspension cultured cells of Rubus fruticosus (blackberry) were tested for their ability to synthesize in vitro sizable quantities of cellulose from UDP-glucose. Both Brij 58 and taurocholate were effective and yielded a substantial percentage of cellulose microfibrils together with (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan (callose). The taurocholate extracts, which did not require the addition of Mg2+, were the most efficient, yielding roughly 20% of cellulose. This cellulose was characterized after callose removal by methylation analysis, electron microscopy, and electron and x-ray synchrotron diffractions; its resistance toward the acid Updegraff reagent was also evaluated. The cellulose microfibrils synthesized in vitro had the same diameter as the endogenous microfibrils isolated from primary cell walls. Both polymers diffracted as cellulose IVI, a disorganized form of cellulose I. Besides these similarities, the in vitro microfibrils had a higher perfection and crystallinity as well as a better resistance toward the Updegraff reagent. These differences can be attributed to the mode of synthesis of the in vitro microfibrils that are able to grow independently in a neighbor-free environment, as opposed to the cellulose in the parent cell walls where new microfibrils have to interweave with the already laid polymers, with the result of a number of structural defects.
引用
收藏
页码:36931 / 36939
页数:9
相关论文
共 72 条
[11]   Cellulose biosynthesis: Exciting times for a difficult field of study [J].
Delmer, DP .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1999, 50 :245-276
[12]   CELLULOSE BIOSYNTHESIS [J].
DELMER, DP ;
AMOR, Y .
PLANT CELL, 1995, 7 (07) :987-1000
[13]  
Dinand E, 1999, U.S. Patent, Patent No. 5964983
[14]  
Emons A.M.C., 1991, Biosynthesis and Biodegradation of Cellulose, P71
[15]   PROCUSTE1 encodes a cellulose synthase required for normal cell elongation specifically in roots and dark-grown hypocotyls of arabidopsis [J].
Fagard, M ;
Desnos, T ;
Desprez, T ;
Goubet, F ;
Refregier, G ;
Mouille, G ;
McCann, M ;
Rayon, C ;
Vernhettes, S ;
Höfte, H .
PLANT CELL, 2000, 12 (12) :2409-2423
[16]   POLYMER NANOCOMPOSITES REINFORCED BY CELLULOSE WHISKERS [J].
FAVIER, V ;
CHANZY, H ;
CAVAILLE, JY .
MACROMOLECULES, 1995, 28 (18) :6365-6367
[17]  
FEINGOLD DS, 1958, J BIOL CHEM, V233, P783
[18]  
FRANZ G, 1990, METHODS PLANT BIOCH, V2, P291
[19]  
GAUTHERET R. J., 1959, CULTURE TISSUS VEGET
[20]   X-RAY WIDE AND NARROW ANGLE STUDIES OF CELLULOSE [J].
HAASE, J ;
HOSEMANN, R ;
RENWANZ, B .
COLLOID AND POLYMER SCIENCE, 1974, 252 (09) :712-717