Irreversible myocardial injury: Assessment with cardiovascular delayed-enhancement MR imaging and comparison of 1.5 and 3.0 T - Initial experience

被引:22
作者
Cheng, Adrian S. H.
Robson, Matthew D.
Neubauer, Stefan
Selvanayagam, Joseph B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Ctr Clin Magnet Resonance Res, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Cardiovasc Med, John Radcliffe Hosp, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2423060299
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To prospectively compare visualization and quantification of irreversible myocardial injury in patients with chronic myocardial infarction at 1.5- and 3.0-T magnetic resonance ( MR) imaging. Materials and Methods: The institutional research ethics committee approved the study. Participants gave written informed consent. Sixteen male patients ( mean age, 66 years +/- 13 [ standard deviation]) with myocardial infarction were imaged with the same sequence by the same operator at 1.5 and 3.0 T. After cine imaging, a bolus of gadodiamide was administered. Short-axis images of entire left ventricle ( LV) were acquired with a breath-hold T1-weighted segmented inversion-recovery turbo fast low-angle shot ( FLASH) sequence. Agreement for myocardial hyperenhancement ( HE) mass between field strengths was assessed with Bland-Altman method; agreement for detection and transmural extent of HE was assessed with kappa statistics. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of mass and transmural extent of HE were assessed at 1.5 and 3.0 T. Results: Bland-Altman analysis revealed no systematic bias ( mean difference, 0.2 g; 95% confidence interval: -0.7 g, 1.2 g) and acceptable limits of agreement ( -3.3 to 3.8 g) between field strengths for HE mass. HE mass measurements were strongly correlated ( R-2 = 0.99); there was no significant difference in measurements at 1.5 and 3.0 T ( 28.1 g +/- 15.7 [ 22.6% +/- 10.9 of LV mass] vs 27.8 g +/- 15.7 [ 22.3% +/- 10.7 of LV mass], respectively; P = .599). For all segments, there was a high degree of agreement for HE detection ( kappa = 0.90) and transmural grade ( kappa = 0.79) between field strengths. Intra- and interobserver variability were low between both field strengths. Initial inversion time selected to null the signal of normal myocardium at 3.0 T was 57 msec +/- 20 longer than at 1.5 T ( P < .01). Conclusion: By using the same turbo FLASH MR pulse sequence, there was strong agreement in mass and transmural extent of myocardial HE between 1.5 and 3.0 T.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 742
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[2]   Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart - A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association [J].
Cerqueira, MD ;
Weissman, NJ ;
Dilsizian, V ;
Jacobs, AK ;
Kaul, S ;
Laskey, WK ;
Pennell, DJ ;
Rumberger, JA ;
Ryan, T ;
Verani, MS .
CIRCULATION, 2002, 105 (04) :539-542
[3]   Transmural extent of acute myocardial infarction predicts long-term improvement in contractile function [J].
Choi, KA ;
Kim, RJ ;
Gubernikoff, G ;
Vargas, JD ;
Parker, M ;
Judd, RA .
CIRCULATION, 2001, 104 (10) :1101-1107
[4]   Frontiers in cardiovascular magnetic resonance [J].
Fuster, V ;
Kim, RJ .
CIRCULATION, 2005, 112 (01) :135-144
[5]   Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2D CINE magnetic resonance imaging:: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3.0 T [J].
Gutberlet, M ;
Schwinge, K ;
Freyhardt, P ;
Spors, B ;
Grothoff, M ;
Denecke, T ;
Lüdemann, L ;
Noeske, R ;
Niendorf, T ;
Felix, R .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2005, 15 (08) :1586-1597
[6]   Comparison of different cardiac MRI sequences at 1.5 T/3.0 T with respect to signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios - Initial experience [J].
Gutberlet, M ;
Spors, B ;
Grothoff, M ;
Freyhardt, P ;
Schwinge, K ;
Plotkin, M ;
Amthauer, H ;
Noeske, R ;
Felix, R .
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2004, 176 (06) :801-808
[7]  
HACKENBROCH M, 2005, P 13 M INT SOC MAGN, P1682
[8]   Comparison of cardiac MRI on 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla clinical whole body systems [J].
Hinton, DP ;
Wald, LL ;
Pitts, J ;
Schmitt, F .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2003, 38 (07) :436-442
[9]   Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function [J].
Kim, RJ ;
Fieno, DS ;
Parrish, TB ;
Harris, K ;
Chen, EL ;
Simonetti, O ;
Bundy, J ;
Finn, JP ;
Klocke, FJ ;
Judd, RM .
CIRCULATION, 1999, 100 (19) :1992-2002
[10]   The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. [J].
Kim, RJ ;
Wu, E ;
Rafael, A ;
Chen, EL ;
Parker, MA ;
Simonetti, O ;
Klocke, FJ ;
Bonow, RO ;
Judd, RM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 343 (20) :1445-1453