Efficacy of static magnetic field therapy in chronic pelvic pain: A double-blind pilot study

被引:60
作者
Brown, CS
Ling, FW
Wan, JY
Pilla, AA
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Pharm Practice & Pharmacoecon, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Psychiat, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[4] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Prevent Med, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[5] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed, New York, NY USA
关键词
static magnets; chronic pelvic pain;
D O I
10.1067/mob.2002.128026
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy of static magnetic field therapy for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) by measuring changes in pain relief and disability. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-two patients with CPP completed 2 weeks and 19 patients completed 4 weeks of randomized double-blind placebo-controlled treatment at a gynecology clinic. Active (500 G) or placebo magnets were applied to abdominal trigger points for 24 hour per day. The McGill Pain Questionnaire, Pain Disability Index, and Clinical Global Impressions Scale were outcome measures. RESULTS: Patients receiving active magnets who completed 4 weeks of double-blind treatment had significantly lower Pain Disability Index (P < .05), Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (P < .05), and Clinical Global Impressions-improvement (P < .01) scores than those receiving placebo magnets, but were more likely to correctly identify their treatment (P < .05). CONCLUSION: SMF therapy significantly improves disability and may reduce pain when active magnets are worn continuously for 4 weeks in patients with CPP, but blinding efficacy is compromised.
引用
收藏
页码:1581 / 1587
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[11]   MCGILL PAIN QUESTIONNAIRE - MAJOR PROPERTIES AND SCORING METHODS [J].
MELZACK, R .
PAIN, 1975, 1 (03) :277-299
[12]  
NAKAGAWA K, 1975, TDK MAGNETO MED PUBL, V1, P1
[13]  
Pilla A. A., 1997, BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY, V43, P241
[14]  
PILLA AA, IN PRESS BIOL EFFECT
[15]   HOW BLIND IS BLIND - ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT AND DOCTOR MEDICATION GUESSES IN A PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL OF IMIPRAMINE AND PHENELZINE [J].
RABKIN, JG ;
MARKOWITZ, JS ;
STEWART, J ;
MCGRATH, P ;
HARRISON, W ;
QUITKIN, FM ;
KLEIN, DF .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 1986, 19 (01) :75-86
[16]  
REITER RC, 1990, CLIN OBSTET GYNECOL, V33, P130
[17]  
REITER RC, 1990, OBSTET GYNECOL, V75, P428
[18]  
SAS Institute, 2000, SAS STAT US GUID
[20]  
TAIT RC, 1987, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V68, P438