Sex differences in the human corpus callosum: Myth or reality?

被引:213
作者
Bishop, KM [1 ]
Wahlsten, D [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV ALBERTA,DEPT PSYCHOL,EDMONTON,AB T6G 2E9,CANADA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
allometry; brain size; effect size; literature review; meta-analysis; morphometry; ratio measures; statistical power;
D O I
10.1016/S0149-7634(96)00049-8
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
It has been claimed that the human corpus callosum shows sex differences, and in particular that the splenium (the posterior portion) is larger in women than in men. Data collected before 1910 from cadavers indicate that, on average, males have larger brains than females and that the average size of their corpus callosum is larger. A meta-analysis of 49 studies published since 1980 reveals no significant sex difference in the size or shape of the splenium of the corpus callosum, whether or not an appropriate adjustment is made for brain size using analysis of covariance or linear regression. It is argued that a simple ratio of corpus callosum size to whole brain size is not an appropriate way to analyse the data and can create a false impression of a sex difference in the corpus callosum. The recent studies, most of which used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), confirm the earlier findings of larger average brain size and overall corpus callosum size for males. The widespread belief that women have a larger splenium than men and consequently think differently is untenable. Causes of and means to avoid such a false impression in future research are discussed. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 601
页数:21
相关论文
共 133 条
[11]   CORPUS-CALLOSUM - REGION-SPECIFIC EFFECTS OF SEX, EARLY EXPERIENCE AND AGE [J].
BERREBI, AS ;
FITCH, RH ;
RALPHE, DL ;
DENENBERG, JO ;
FRIEDRICH, VL ;
DENENBERG, VH .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1988, 438 (1-2) :216-224
[13]  
BLEIER R, 1988, SOC NEUR ANN M DALL
[14]  
BLUMRICH C, 1995, NEWSWEEK 0327, P51
[15]  
BREEDLOVE SM, 1994, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V45, P389, DOI 10.1146/annurev.psych.45.1.389
[16]   EVALUATING THE EMPIRICAL SUPPORT FOR THE GESCHWIND-BEHAN-GALABURDA MODEL OF CEREBRAL LATERALIZATION [J].
BRYDEN, MP ;
MCMANUS, IC ;
BULMANFLEMING, MB .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 1994, 26 (02) :103-167
[17]  
Burke HL., 1994, NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, V8, P563, DOI [10.1037/0894-4105.8.4.563, DOI 10.1037/0894-4105.8.4.563]
[18]   A procedure for combining sample standardized mean differences and vote counts to estimate the population standardized mean difference in fixed effects models [J].
Bushman, BJ ;
Wang, MC .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 1996, 1 (01) :66-80
[19]   INTERIM ANALYSES, STOPPING RULES AND DATA MONITORING IN CLINICAL-TRIALS IN EUROPE [J].
BUYSE, M .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1993, 12 (5-6) :509-520
[20]   SCIENCE AND BELIEF - PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL RESEARCH ON SEXUAL ORIENTATION [J].
BYNE, W .
JOURNAL OF HOMOSEXUALITY, 1995, 28 (3-4) :303-344