Variation in the quality of lumbar spine MR images in Washington State

被引:10
作者
Jarvik, JG
Robertson, WD
Wessbecher, F
Roger, K
Solomon, C
Whitten, R
Lumley, T
Deyo, RA
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Gen Internal Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Tacoma Radiol Associates, Tacoma, WA 98401 USA
[7] Valley Radiologists, Renton, WA 98055 USA
[8] Washington State Hlth Care Author, Olympia, WA 98501 USA
关键词
magnetic resonance (MR); quality assurance; radiology and radiologists; socioeconomic issues; spine; MR;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ma35483
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
PURPOSE: To investigate the variation in quality of lumbar spine magnetic resonance (MR) images as a function of type of ownership of the imaging center, number of studies performed per month, specialty training of the image interpreter, and field strength of the MR unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from all imaging facilities in western Washington state that received reimbursement from the Washington State Health Care Authority. Three readers with expertise in spine imaging, who were blinded to center and patient identification information, rated the technical image quality-of each study. All MR images of the lumbar spine (maximum of six) paid for by the health care authority were evaluated. If a center had performed more than six studies, then six were randomly selected for evaluation. RESULTS: Variation in quality scores among sites was significant (P = .001). Field strength was the strongest predictor of better quality. Poorer quality was associated with for-profit ownership, a larger number of radiologists at the site reading MR images, and a larger percentage of studies checked by a radiologist prior to the end of the examination. CONCLUSION: There was significant variation in the quality of MR images of the lumbar spine, and at least a portion of this Variation was attributable to characteristics of the imaging center.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 490
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1972, STUDIES QUALITY LIFE
[2]
CONSENSUS METHODS - CHARACTERISTICS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE [J].
FINK, A ;
KOSECOFF, J ;
CHASSIN, M ;
BROOK, RH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1984, 74 (09) :979-983
[3]
Fisher L.D., 1993, BIOSTATISTICS METHOD
[4]
EQUIVALENCE OF WEIGHTED KAPPA AND INTRACLASS CORRELATION COEFFICIENT AS MEASURES OF RELIABILITY [J].
FLEISS, JL ;
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1973, 33 (03) :613-619
[5]
Hennekens C.H., 1987, EPIDEMIOLOGY MED
[6]
MR-IMAGING FIELD-STRENGTH - PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF THE DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY OF MR FOR DIAGNOSIS OF MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS AT 0.5-T AND 1.5-T [J].
LEE, DH ;
VELLET, AD ;
ELIASZIW, M ;
VIDITO, L ;
EBERS, GC ;
RICE, GP ;
HEWETT, L ;
DUNLAVY, S .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 194 (01) :257-262
[7]
SELF-REFERRAL IN PRIVATE OFFICES FOR IMAGING STUDIES PERFORMED IN PENNSYLVANIA-BLUE-SHIELD SUBSCRIBERS DURING 1991 [J].
LEVIN, DC ;
EDMISTON, RB ;
RICCI, JA ;
BEAM, LM ;
ROSETTI, GF ;
HARFORD, RJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 189 (02) :371-375
[8]
Psychiatric hospital ownership and performance - Do nonprofit organizations offer advantages in markets characterized by asymmetric information? [J].
Mark, TL .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 1996, 31 (03) :631-649
[9]
PELVIC PHASED-ARRAY COIL - IMAGE QUALITY ASSESSMENT FOR SPIN-ECHO MR IMAGING [J].
MCCAULEY, TR ;
MCCARTHY, S ;
LANGE, R .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1992, 10 (04) :513-522
[10]
THE ANALYSIS OF LONGITUDINAL POLYTOMOUS DATA - GENERALIZED ESTIMATING EQUATIONS AND CONNECTIONS WITH WEIGHTED LEAST-SQUARES [J].
MILLER, ME ;
DAVIS, CS ;
LANDIS, JR .
BIOMETRICS, 1993, 49 (04) :1033-1044