MR-IMAGING FIELD-STRENGTH - PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF THE DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY OF MR FOR DIAGNOSIS OF MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS AT 0.5-T AND 1.5-T

被引:48
作者
LEE, DH
VELLET, AD
ELIASZIW, M
VIDITO, L
EBERS, GC
RICE, GP
HEWETT, L
DUNLAVY, S
机构
[1] UNIV WESTERN ONTARIO,DEPT EPIDEMIOL & BIOSTAT,LONDON,ON,CANADA
[2] UNIV HOSP LONDON,DEPT CLIN NEUROL SCI,LONDON,ON N6A 5A5,CANADA
[3] ROBARTS RES INST,LONDON,ON N6A 5C1,CANADA
关键词
BRAIN; MR; WHITE MATTER; MAGNETIC RESONANCE (MR); COMPARATIVE STUDIES; TECHNOLOGY; SCLEROSIS; MULTIPLE;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.194.1.7997564
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic efficacy of middle-field-strength and high-field-strength magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-two patients with suspected multiple sclerosis underwent MR imaging at 0.5 and 1.5 T. Imaging parameters were identical except for band width optimization at middle field strength. Images were interpreted by radiologists expert in MR imaging who were blinded to diagnosis and field strength. The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis was made by experienced neurologists, and indeterminate cases and patients without clinical evidence of multiple sclerosis were followed up for 6 months to 1 year. RESULTS: There was no difference in accuracy, sensitivity, or specificity between scanners in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis or white matter disease. Equal numbers of lesions were detected at both field strengths in all parts of the brain. Image quality was always good or adequate at middle field strength. CONCLUSION: Higher field strength does not confer higher accuracy in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis with current-generation MR imagers.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 262
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   MR IMAGING OF CEREBRAL HEMATOMAS AT DIFFERENT FIELD STRENGTHS - THEORY AND APPLICATIONS [J].
BROOKS, RA ;
DICHIRO, G ;
PATRONAS, N .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1989, 13 (02) :194-206
[2]  
DUYN JH, 1993, 1993 SOC MAGN RES ME, P1
[3]   MR IMAGING OF THE TEMPOROMANDIBULAR-JOINT - COMPARISON OF IMAGES OF AUTOPSY SPECIMENS MADE AT 0.3 T AND 1.5 T WITH ANATOMIC CRYOSECTIONS [J].
HANSSON, LG ;
WESTESSON, PL ;
KATZBERG, RW ;
TALLENTS, RH ;
KURITA, K ;
HOLTAS, S ;
SVENSSON, SA ;
ERIKSSON, L ;
JOHANSEN, CC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1989, 152 (06) :1241-1244
[4]   FIELD-STRENGTH IN NEURO-MR IMAGING - A COMPARISON OF 0.5-T AND 1.5-T [J].
JACK, CR ;
BERQUIST, TH ;
MILLER, GM ;
FORBES, GS ;
GRAY, JE ;
MORIN, RL ;
ILSTRUP, DM .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1990, 14 (04) :505-513
[5]  
JACKSON JA, 1985, AM J NEURORADIOL, V6, P171
[6]   NUCLEAR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS [J].
LUKES, SA ;
CROOKS, LE ;
AMINOFF, MJ ;
KAUFMAN, L ;
PANITCH, HS ;
MILLS, C ;
NORMAN, D .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1983, 13 (06) :592-601
[7]   FUNCTIONAL BRAIN MAPPING USING MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING - SIGNAL CHANGES ACCOMPANYING VISUAL-STIMULATION [J].
MENON, RS ;
OGAWA, S ;
KIM, SG ;
ELLERMANN, JM ;
MERKLE, H ;
TANK, DW ;
UGURBIL, K .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1992, 27 :S47-S53
[9]   ASSESSMENT OF MRI CRITERIA FOR A DIAGNOSIS OF MS [J].
OFFENBACHER, H ;
FAZEKAS, F ;
SCHMIDT, R ;
FREIDL, W ;
FLOOH, E ;
PAYER, F ;
LECHNER, H .
NEUROLOGY, 1993, 43 (05) :905-909
[10]   COMPARISON OF CT, LOW-FIELD-STRENGTH MR IMAGING, AND HIGH-FIELD-STRENGTH MR IMAGING - WORK IN PROGRESS [J].
ORRISON, WW ;
STIMAC, GK ;
STEVENS, EA ;
LAMASTERS, DL ;
ESPINOSA, MC ;
COBB, L ;
METTLER, FA .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 181 (01) :121-127