Organizational designs for R&D

被引:39
作者
DeSanctis, G [1 ]
Glass, JT
Ensing, IM
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Fuqua Sch Business, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Inst Integrat Management & Engn, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
来源
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE | 2002年 / 16卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.5465/AME.2002.8540314
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Research and development is becoming increasingly business-oriented, and corporate reliance on new technology and innovation is greater than ever. How can R&D activities be organized to yield the greatest value for the enterprise? A study of 14 leading technology-intensive companies in six industries illustrates how three organizational designs are being used to manage distributed, flexible R&D organizations: (1) decentralized, (2) networked, and (3) integrated. Decentralized designs limit the role of a central RD group; they direct R&D resources more toward products and markets rather than basic scientific activities. Networked designs push the boundaries of R&D outside the confines of a centra],R&D group and the firm as a whole. Integrated models use sophisticated communication linkages to tie centralized, science-based activities with the business needs of the corporation. Within the three design approaches, there are design variants, each with its positive and negative tradeoffs. We show how some designs for R&D are more effective than others and provide suggestions for how companies in search of an ideal organization design for R&D can select among possible configurations to promote adaptive, value-oriented R&D organizations.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 66
页数:12
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, GLOBAL METANATIONAL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, FORMATION INTERORGAN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, FLEXIBLE FIRM CAPABI
[4]   Organizations unfettered: Organizational form in an information-intensive economy [J].
Child, J ;
McGrath, RG .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 44 (06) :1135-1148
[5]  
DAFT RL, 1993, ORGAN SCI, V4, pR1
[6]  
DeSanctis G., 1999, SHAPING ORG FORM COM
[7]   Knowledge-worker productivity: The biggest challenge [J].
Drucker, PF .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1999, 41 (02) :79-+
[8]  
DYER G, 2002, FINANCIAL TIMES 0125, P15
[9]   ORGANIZATION STRATEGY AND STRUCTURAL DIFFERENCES FOR RADICAL VERSUS INCREMENTAL INNOVATION [J].
ETTLIE, JE ;
BRIDGES, WP ;
OKEEFE, RD .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (06) :682-695
[10]  
Forte M, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P753, DOI 10.1002/1097-0266(200007)21:7<753::AID-SMJ118>3.0.CO