Statistical learning within and between modalities - Pitting abstract against stimulus-specific representations

被引:209
作者
Conway, Christopher M.
Christiansen, Morten H.
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Psychol, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01801.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
When learners encode sequential patterns and generalize their knowledge to novel instances, are they relying on abstract or stimulus-specific representations? Research on artificial grammar learning (AGL) has shown transfer of learning from one stimulus set to another, and such findings have encouraged the view that statistical learning is mediated by abstract representations that are independent of the sense modality or perceptual features of the stimuli. Using a novel modification of the standard AGL paradigm, we obtained data to the contrary. These experiments pitted abstract processing against stimulus-specific learning. The findings show that statistical learning results in knowledge that is stimulus-specific rather than abstract. They show furthermore that learning can proceed in parallel for multiple input streams along separate perceptual dimensions or sense modalities. We conclude that learning sequential structure and generalizing to novel stimuli inherently involve learning mechanisms that are closely tied to the perceptual characteristics of the input.
引用
收藏
页码:905 / 912
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[11]   The transfer of abstract principles governing complex adaptive systems [J].
Goldstone, RL ;
Sakamoto, Y .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 46 (04) :414-466
[12]   Variability and detection of invariant structure [J].
Gómez, RL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 13 (05) :431-436
[13]   Procedural learning in Broca's aphasia: Dissociation between the implicit acquisition of spatio-motor and phoneme sequences [J].
Goschke, T ;
Friederici, AD ;
Kotz, SA ;
van Kampen, A .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 13 (03) :370-388
[14]   The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation [J].
Keele, SW ;
Ivry, R ;
Mayr, U ;
Hazeltine, E ;
Heuer, H .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2003, 110 (02) :316-339
[15]   An alternative to null-hypothesis significance tests [J].
Killeen, PR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (05) :345-353
[16]   Recollection, fluency, and the explicit/implicit distinction in artificial grammar learning [J].
Kinder, A ;
Shanks, DR ;
Cock, J ;
Tunney, RJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2003, 132 (04) :551-565
[17]   Visual statistical learning in infancy: evidence for a domain general learning mechanism [J].
Kirkham, NZ ;
Slemmer, JA ;
Johnson, SP .
COGNITION, 2002, 83 (02) :B35-B42
[18]   Dissociating explicit and procedural-learning based systems of perceptual category learning [J].
Maddox, WT ;
Ashby, FG .
BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2004, 66 (03) :309-332
[19]  
Manza L., 1997, IMPLICIT IS IMPLICIT, P73, DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198523512.003.0004
[20]   Rule learning by seven-month-old infants [J].
Marcus, GF ;
Vijayan, S ;
Rao, SB ;
Vishton, PM .
SCIENCE, 1999, 283 (5398) :77-80