The treatment of depression in UK general practice: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants compared

被引:119
作者
Lawrenson, RA [1 ]
Tyrer, F
Newson, RB
Farmer, RDT
机构
[1] Univ Surrey, European Inst Hlth & Med Sci, Guildford GU2 5RF, Surrey, England
[2] MRC, Clin Trials Unit, London WC1E 6AU, England
[3] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, London, England
关键词
depression; selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; tricyclic antidepressants; prescription of antidepressants; patient dropouts;
D O I
10.1016/S0165-0327(99)00147-0
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Antidepressants are commonly prescribed by general practitioners as treatment for depression. Controversy exists as to the effectiveness in everyday use of the older tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) when compared to the newer selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Aim: To investigate the patterns of current prescribing of antidepressants for the treatment of depression and compare TCAs with the newer SSRIs. Method: The study population was patients attending 151 computerised general practices from throughout the United Kingdom between 1991 and 1996. Patients with new prescriptions for antidepressants and a diagnosis of depression were identified. Age and gender distributions, prescribed doses and drop-out rates were investigated. Results: During the study period 9.8% of patients received a prescription for an antidepressant, there was a 40% increase in the prescribing rate of TCAs and a 460% increase in SSRI prescribing. TCAs were initially prescribed in sub-therapeutic doses. More than 50% of patients ceased taking their antidepressants within 6 weeks of starting treatment. Fluoxetine and paroxetine were more likely to be prescribed for a therapeutic period than were other antidepressants. Conclusions: General practitioners should prescribe a therapeutic dose of antidepressant for a recognised therapeutic period to ensure that patients with depression receive the most effective treatment. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 157
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[11]   Are SSRIs a cost-effective alternative to tricyclics? [J].
Hotopf, M ;
Lewis, G ;
Normand, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1996, 168 (04) :404-409
[12]   WHAT PRICE DEPRESSION - THE COST OF DEPRESSION AND THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT [J].
JONSSON, B ;
BEBBINGTON, PE .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1994, 164 :665-673
[13]   THE ROBUST INFERENCE FOR THE COX PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL [J].
LIN, DY ;
WEI, LJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1989, 84 (408) :1074-1078
[14]  
MacDonald TM, 1996, BRIT MED J, V313, P860
[15]   General practitioners' perceptions of the tolerability of antidepressant drugs: A comparison of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants [J].
Martin, RM ;
Hilton, SR ;
Kerry, SM ;
Richards, NM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 314 (7081) :646-651
[16]   COMPARISON OF COMPLIANCE BETWEEN SEROTONIN REUPTAKE INHIBITORS AND TRICYCLIC ANTIDEPRESSANTS - A METAANALYSIS [J].
MONTGOMERY, SA ;
KASPER, S .
INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 9 :33-40
[17]  
*NHS MAN EX, 1993, COMP GP PRACT 1993 S
[18]   RECOGNITION AND MANAGEMENT OF DEPRESSION IN GENERAL-PRACTICE - CONSENSUS STATEMENT [J].
PAYKEL, ES ;
PRIEST, RG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 305 (6863) :1198-1202
[19]  
RAND EH, 1991, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V43, P847
[20]  
Saint-Yves I F, 1992, Health Bull (Edinb), V50, P422