Modulation of the error-related negativity by response conflict

被引：116

作者：

Danielmeier, Claudia ^{[1
]}

Wessel, Jan R. ^{[1
]}

Steinhauser, Marco ^{[2
]}

Ullsperger, Markus ^{[1
,3
]}

机构：

[1] Max Planck Inst Neurol Res, Cognit Neurol Grp, D-50931 Cologne, Germany

[2] Univ Konstanz, Dept Psychol, Constance, Germany

[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Donders Ctr Cognit Biol Psychol, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands

来源：

PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY | 2009年 / 46卷 / 06期

关键词：

ERN; Cognitive control; Conflict monitoring; Performance monitoring; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; COGNITIVE CONTROL; ANTERIOR CINGULATE; PERFORMANCE; ERP; ATTENTION; DYNAMICS; REFLECT; CORTEX; TASKS;

D O I：

10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00860.x

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

An arrow version of the Eriksen flanker task was employed to investigate the influence of conflict on the error-related negativity (ERN) The degree of conflict was modulated by varying the distance between flankers and the target arrow (CLOSE and FAR conditions). Error rates and reaction time data from a behavioral experiment were used to adapt a connectionist model of this task This model was based on the conflict monitoring theory and simulated behavioral and event-related potential data The computational model predicted an increased ERN amplitude in FAR incompatible (the low-conflict condition) compared to CLOSE incompatible errors (the high-conflict condition) A subsequent ERP experiment confirmed the model predictions. The computational model explains this finding with larger postresponse conflict in far trials. In addition, data and model predictions of the N2 and the LRP support the conflict interpretation of the ERN

引用

页码：1288 / 1298

页数：11

共 34 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 1990, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL

[2] Conflict monitoring and cognitive control [J].

Botvinick, MM ;

Braver, TS ;

Barch, DM ;

Carter, CS ;

Cohen, JD .

PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 108 (03) :624-652

[3] Sequential compatibility effects and cognitive control: Does conflict really matter? [J].

Burle, B ;

Allain, S ;

Vidal, F ;

Hasbroucq, T .

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2005, 31 (04) :831-837

[4] Does the error negativity reflect the degree of response conflict? [J].

Carbonnell, Laurence ;

Falkenstein, Michael .

BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 1095 :124-130

[5] Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance [J].

Carter, CS ;

Braver, TS ;

Barch, DM ;

Botvinick, MM ;

Noll, D ;

Cohen, JD .

SCIENCE, 1998, 280 (5364) :747-749

[6] MODERN MIND-BRAIN READING - PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, PHYSIOLOGY, AND COGNITION [J].

COLES, MGH .

PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 26 (03) :251-269

[7] Why is there an ERN/Ne on correct trials? Response representations, stimulus-related components, and the theory of error-processing [J].

Coles, MGH ;

Scheffers, MK ;

Holroyd, CB .

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 56 (03) :173-189

[8] Trial-by-trial coupling of concurrent electroencephalogram and functional magnetic resonance imaging identifies the dynamics of performance monitoring [J].

Debener, S ;

Ullsperger, M ;

Siegel, M ;

Fiehler, K ;

von Cramon, DY ;

Engel, AK .

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 25 (50) :11730-11737

[9] EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis [J].

Delorme, A ;

Makeig, S .

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2004, 134 (01) :9-21

[10] Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis [J].

Delorme, Arnaud ;

Sejnowski, Terrence ;

Makeig, Scott .

NEUROIMAGE, 2007, 34 (04) :1443-1449

← 1 2 3 4 →