Influence of uncertain boundary conditions and model structure on flood inundation predictions

被引:288
作者
Pappenberger, Florian [1 ]
Matgen, Patrick
Beven, Keith J.
Henry, Jean-Baptiste
Pfister, Laurent
de, Paul Fraipont
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster LA1 4YW, England
[2] Ctr Rech Publ Gabriel Lippmann, L-4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg
[3] VTT Informat Technol, Espoo 02044, Finland
[4] Strasbourg Univ, Serv Reg Traitement Image & Teledetect, Strasbourg, France
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
flooding; uncertainty analysis; free surface flow; sensitivity analyse; modelling;
D O I
10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.11.012
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
In this study, the GLUE methodology is applied to establish the sensitivity of flood inundation predictions to uncertainty of the upstream boundary condition and bridges within the modelled region. An understanding of such uncertainties is essential to improve flood forecasting and floodplain mapping. The model has been evaluated on a large data set. This paper shows uncertainty of the upstream boundary can have significant impact on the model results, exceeding the importance of model parameter uncertainty in some areas. However, this depends on the hydraulic conditions in the reach e.g. internal boundary conditions and, for example, the amount of backwater within the modelled region. The type of bridge implementation can have local effects, which is strongly influenced by the bridge geometry (in this case the area of the culvert). However, the type of bridge will not merely influence the model performance within the region of the structure, but also other evaluation criteria such as the travel time. This also highlights the difficulties in establishing which parameters have to be more closely examined in order to achieve better fits. In this study no parameter set or model implementation that fulfils all evaluation criteria could be established. We propose four different approaches to this problem: closer investigation of anomalies; introduction of local parameters; increasing the size of acceptable error bounds; and resorting to local model evaluation. Moreover, we show that it can be advantageous to decouple the classification into behavioural and non-behavioural model data/parameter sets from the calculation of uncertainty bounds. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1430 / 1449
页数:20
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]   Towards the hydraulics of the hydroinformatics era [J].
Abbott, MB ;
Babovic, VM ;
Cunge, JA .
JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH, 2001, 39 (04) :339-349
[2]   Integration of heuristic knowledge with analytical tools for the selection of flood damage reduction measures [J].
Ahmad, S ;
Simonovic, SP .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2001, 28 (02) :208-221
[3]  
[Anonymous], ILRI PUBLICATION
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Rainfall-runoff Modelling, The Primer
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1995, GUID EXPR UNC MEAS
[6]   Flood risk assessment and associated uncertainty [J].
Apel, H ;
Thieken, AH ;
Merz, B ;
Blöschl, G .
NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2004, 4 (02) :295-308
[7]   Uncertainty and equifinality in calibrating distributed roughness coefficients in a flood propagation model with limited data [J].
Aronica, G ;
Hankin, B ;
Beven, K .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 1998, 22 (04) :349-365
[8]  
Barkau R.L., 1997, UNET ONE DIMENSIONAL
[9]  
BARROWS HK, 1907, WATER SUPPLY PAPER U, V201, P13
[10]   Observational data and scale-dependent parameterizations: explorations using a virtual hydrological reality [J].
Bashford, KE ;
Beven, KJ ;
Young, PC .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2002, 16 (02) :293-312