Soil C extracted with water or K2SO4:: pH effect on determination of microbial biomass

被引:30
作者
Haney, RL [1 ]
Franzluebbers, AJ
Hons, FM
Zuberer, DA
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Texas Agr Expt Stn, Dept Soil & Crop Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] ARS, USDA, J Phil Campbell Sr Nat Resource Conservat Ctr, Watkinsville, GA 30677 USA
关键词
extractable carbon; chloroform fumigation-extraction; microbial biomass;
D O I
10.4141/S99-011
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Routine determination of soil microbial biomass C has shifted during the past decade from chloroform fumigation-incubation to chloroform fumigation-extraction using 0.5 M K2SO4 as extractant. We compared extractable C with water and 0.5 M K2SO4 in eight soils ranging in pH from 5.4 to 8.3. In unfumigated soils with low pH, extractable C was 0.8- to 1.2-fold greater with water than with 0.5 M K2SO4. However, in unfumigated soils with pH > 7.7, extractable C, although not statistically significant, was 11 to 19% less with water than with 0.5 M K2SO4. In fumigated soils, no difference in extractable C between water and 0.5 M K2SO4 was detected among soils with pH < 7.7, but extractable C was 13 to 17% less with water than with 0.5 M K2SO4 with pH > 7.7. Our results suggest that 0.5 M K2SO4 (1) may flocculate soil and cause adsorption of solubilized C onto colloids at pH < 7.7, but (2) may disperse calcareous soils at pH > 7.7, thereby differentially affecting the fate of solubilized C depending upon soil pH. Our results put into question the widespread adaptability of using chloroform fumigation-extraction to estimate microbial biomass C.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 533
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]   EVALUATION OF METHODS TO ESTIMATE THE SOIL MICROBIAL BIOMASS AND THE RELATIONSHIP WITH SOIL TEXTURE AND ORGANIC-MATTER [J].
KAISER, EA ;
MUELLER, T ;
JOERGENSEN, RG ;
INSAM, H ;
HEINEMEYER, O .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1992, 24 (07) :675-683
[12]   MICROBIAL BIOMASS RESPONSE TO A RAPID INCREASE IN WATER POTENTIAL WHEN DRY SOIL IS WETTED [J].
KIEFT, TL ;
SOROKER, E ;
FIRESTONE, MK .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1987, 19 (02) :119-126
[13]   CURRENT METHODS FOR MEASURING MICROBIAL BIOMASS-C IN SOIL - POTENTIALS AND LIMITATIONS [J].
MARTENS, R .
BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 1995, 19 (2-3) :87-99
[14]   DYNAMICS OF SOIL MICROBIAL BIOMASS AND WATER-SOLUBLE ORGANIC C IN BRETON L AFTER 50 YEARS OF CROPPING TO 2 ROTATIONS [J].
MCGILL, WB ;
CANNON, KR ;
ROBERTSON, JA ;
COOK, FD .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1986, 66 (01) :1-19
[15]  
Nelson R. E., 1982, Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, P181
[16]  
Oades J. M., 1989, Minerals in Soil Environments, SSSA Book Series, no. 1., P89
[17]  
OCIO JA, 1990, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V22, P739
[18]  
QUINN JG, 1964, P SOIL SCI SOC AM, V28, P456
[19]   EVALUATION AND CALIBRATION OF BIOCHEMICAL METHODS TO MEASURE MICROBIAL BIOMASS-C AND BIOMASS-N IN SOILS FROM WESTERN-AUSTRALIA [J].
SPARLING, G ;
ZHU, CY .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1993, 25 (12) :1793-1801
[20]  
*SPSS INC, 1997, SIGM VERS WIND VERS