Evaluation of the minimum iodine concentration for contrast-enhanced subtraction mammography

被引:45
作者
Baldelli, P.
Bravin, A.
Di Maggio, C.
Gennaro, G.
Sarnelli, A.
Taibi, A.
Gambaccini, M.
机构
[1] Univ Ferrara, Dept Phys, I-44100 Ferrara, Italy
[2] European Synchrotron Radiat Facil, F-38043 Grenoble, France
[3] Univ Padua, Dept Oncol & Surg Sci, I-35128 Padua, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/51/17/008
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Early manifestation of breast cancer is often very subtle and is displayed in a complex and variable pattern of normal anatomy that may obscure the disease. The use of dual-energy techniques, that can remove the structural noise, and contrast media, that enhance the region surrounding the tumour, could help us to improve the detectability of the lesions. The aim of this work is to investigate the use of an iodine-based contrast medium in mammography with two different double exposure techniques: K-edge subtraction mammography and temporal subtraction mammography. Both techniques have been investigated by using an ideal source, like monochromatic beams produced at a synchrotron radiation facility and a clinical digital mammography system. A dedicated three-component phantom containing cavities filled with different iodine concentrations has been developed and used for measurements. For each technique, information about the minimum iodine concentration, which provides a significant enhancement of the detectability of the pathology by minimizing the risk due to high dose and high concentration of contrast medium, has been obtained. In particular, for cavities of 5 and 8 mm in diameter filled with iodine solutions, the minimum concentration needed to obtain a contrast-to-noise ratio of 5 with a mean glandular dose of 2 mGy has been calculated. The minimum concentrations estimated with monochromatic beams and K-edge subtraction mammography are 0.9 mg ml(-1) and 1.34 mg ml(-1) for the biggest and smallest details, respectively, while for temporal subtraction mammography they are 0.84 mg ml(-1) and 1.31 mg ml(-1). With the conventional clinical system the minimum concentrations for the K-edge subtraction mammography are 4.13 mg ml(-1) ( 8 mm diameter) and 5.75 mg ml(-1) (5 mm diameter), while for the temporal subtraction mammography they are 1.01 mg ml(-1) (8 mm diameter) and 1.57 mg ml(-1) (5 mm diameter).
引用
收藏
页码:4233 / 4251
页数:19
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   BREAST-LESIONS EXAMINED BY DIGITAL ANGIOGRAPHY - WORK IN PROGRESS [J].
ACKERMAN, LV ;
WATT, AC ;
SHETTY, P ;
FLYNN, MJ ;
BURKE, M ;
KAMBOURIS, A ;
FINE, G ;
WILDERMAN, S .
RADIOLOGY, 1985, 155 (01) :65-68
[3]  
Berger M.J., 1987, United States, Technical Report., DOI DOI 10.2172/6016002
[4]   Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography [J].
Boone, JM ;
Fewell, TR ;
Jennings, RJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (12) :1863-1874
[5]   COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC MAMMOGRAPHY USING A CONVENTIONAL BODY SCANNER [J].
CHANG, CHJ ;
NESBIT, DE ;
FISHER, DR ;
FRITZ, SL ;
DWYER, SJ ;
TEMPLETON, AW ;
LIN, F ;
JEWELL, WR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1982, 138 (03) :553-558
[6]   Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol [J].
Dance, DR ;
Skinner, CL ;
Young, KC ;
Beckett, JR ;
Kotre, CJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (11) :3225-3240
[7]   MONTE-CARLO CALCULATION OF CONVERSION FACTORS FOR THE ESTIMATION OF MEAN GLANDULAR BREAST DOSE [J].
DANCE, DR .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1990, 35 (09) :1211-1219
[8]   Instrumentation of the ESRF medical imaging facility [J].
Elleaume, H ;
Charvet, AM ;
Berkvens, P ;
Berruyer, G ;
Brochard, T ;
Dabin, Y ;
Dominguez, MC ;
Draperi, A ;
Fiedler, S ;
Goujon, G ;
Le Duc, G ;
Mattenet, M ;
Nemoz, C ;
Perez, M ;
Renier, M ;
Schulze, C ;
Spanne, P ;
Suortti, P ;
Thomlinson, W ;
Esteve, F ;
Bertrand, B ;
Le Bas, JF .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 1999, 428 (2-3) :513-527
[9]  
Gennaro G, 2005, PHYS MED BIOL, V50, P1851, DOI 10.1088/0031-9155/50/8/015
[10]  
Holland AE, 2000, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V11, P601, DOI 10.1002/1522-2586(200006)11:6<601::AID-JMRI5>3.0.CO