Genetically modified food in the news: media representations of the GM debate in the UK

被引:59
作者
Augoustinos, Martha [1 ]
Crabb, Shona
Shepherd, Richard [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Psychol, Discourse & Social Psychol Unit, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[2] Univ Surrey, Food Consumer Behav & Hlth Res Ctr, Guildford GU2 5XH, Surrey, England
关键词
GM Nation? debate; GM crops and food; media representations; critical discourse analysis; stakeholder interests; British public opinion; PUBLIC-OPINION; PARTICIPATION; BIOTECHNOLOGY; NATION; GENES;
D O I
10.1177/0963662508088669
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This paper analyses a corpus of articles on GM crops and food which appeared in six UK newspapers in the first three months of 2004, the year following the GM Nation? debate (2003). Using the methods of critical discourse analysis we focus on how specific and pervasive representations of the major stakeholders in the national debate on GM-the British public, the British government, the science of GM, and biotechnology companies-served significant rhetorical functions in the controversy. Of particular significance was the pervasive representation of the British public as uniformly opposed to GM crops and food which served rhetorically to position the British government as undemocratic and as being beholden to powerful political and economic interests. Of significance also in our analysis, is how the science of GM farming itself became a highly contested arena. In short, our analysis demonstrates how the GM debate was represented in the newsprint media as a "battleground" of competing interests. We conclude by considering the possible implications of this representation given the increasing emphasis placed on the importance of deliberative and inclusive forms of science policy decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 114
页数:17
相关论文
共 34 条
[11]  
Durant J., 1998, BIOTECHNOLOGY PUBLIC
[12]  
Edwards Derek., 1992, Discursive Psychology, V8, DOI DOI 10.1002/CASP.2450050106
[13]   The media and genetically modified foods: Evidence in support of social amplification of risk [J].
Frewer, LJ ;
Miles, S ;
Marsh, R .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2002, 22 (04) :701-711
[14]  
Gaskell G., 2003, AgBioForum, V6, P55
[15]  
Gaskell G., 2001, BIOTECHNOLOGY 1996 2
[16]  
Gilbert G.Nigel., 1984, OPENING PANDORAS BOX
[17]  
Heller R., 2003, GM Nation? The findings of the public debate
[18]   Talking 'facts': identity and rationality in industry perspectives on genetic modification [J].
Henderson, Alison ;
Weaver, C. Kay ;
Cheney, George .
DISCOURSE STUDIES, 2007, 9 (01) :9-41
[19]  
Horlick-Jones T., 2007, GM DEBATE RISK POLIT
[20]   Citizen engagement processes as information systems: the role of knowledge and the concept of translation quality [J].
Horlick-Jones, Tom ;
Rowe, Gene ;
Walls, John .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2007, 16 (03) :259-278