共 53 条
Validation of high-resolution water-excitation magnetic resonance imaging for quantitative assessment of thin cartilage layers
被引:65
作者:
Graichen, H
Springer, V
Flaman, T
Stammberger, T
Glaser, C
Englmeier, KH
Reiser, M
Eckstein, F
机构:
[1] Univ Munich, Inst Anat, Musculoskeletal Res Grp, D-80336 Munich, Germany
[2] GSF, Inst Med Informat, D-85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany
[3] Univ Munich, Klinikum Grosshadern, Inst Radiol Diagnost, D-81377 Munich, Germany
关键词:
cartilage;
magnetic resonance imaging;
cartilage thickness;
elbow;
D O I:
10.1053/joca.1999.0278
中图分类号:
R826.8 [整形外科学];
R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学];
R726.2 [小儿整形外科学];
R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Objective: To employ a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging technique for quantitative assessment of thin cartilage layers, and to validate the cartilage volume and thickness measurements. Methods.. We investigated 10 normal elbow joints (age 20 to 69 years) with a 3D gradient echo sequence with selective water excitation (TR 18 ms; TE 9 ms; FA 25(6), resolution 1x0.25x0.25 mm(2) imaging time 19 min). After interpolating the image data to a 0.125x0.125 mm2 in-plane resolution, the cartilage plates were segmented, reconstructed in 3D, and the cartilage volume and thickness determined with a 3D Euclidean distance transformation algorithm, independent of the original section plane. The cartilage volume and thickness values were compared with CT arthrography and A-mode ultrasound. Results: The mean systematic difference between the elbow cartilage volume obtained from MR imaging and CT arthrography was -0.11% (-6.0 mm(3)) and the mean random difference 5.7% (314 mm3). Except for the fovea capitis radii, the deviations were not statistically significant (range -7.6 to +11.7%). In the humerus, the mean cartilage thickness (average=1.35 mm) was overestimated relative to GT arthrography (+20.7%/+0.23 mm), and slightly underestimated relative to A-mode ultrasound (-6.0%1-0.05 mm). With few exceptions, there were no significant differences between MRI, CT arthrography and ultrasound in the other joint surfaces of the elbow (random deviations between 0.08 and 0.39 mm). Conclusions: The technique presented can be applied for determining the cartilage volume and 3D thickness in joints with thin cartilage layers with a reasonable degree of accuracy. (C) 2000 OsteoArthritis Research Society International.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 114
页数:9
相关论文