Transition state imbalances in gas phase proton transfers. Ab initio study of the carbon-to-carbon proton transfer from the protonated acetaldehyde cation to acetaldehyde enol

被引:33
作者
Bernasconi, CF
Wenzel, PJ
机构
[1] Dept. of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Cruz
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ja960233j
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The identity carbon-to-carbon proton transfer between oxygen-protonated acetaldehyde (syn and anti) and acetaldehyde enol (syn and anti) has been studied by nb initio methods al the 6-311+G**//6-311+G**, MP2/6-311+G**//6-311+G**, and MP2/6-311+G**//MP2/6-311+G** levels, Previous calculations on the proton transfer between acetaldehyde and its enolate ion have been extended to the MP2/6-311+G**//MP2/6-311+G** level, On the basis of Mulliken and natural population analysis charges, the transition states of all reactions under study show a strong imbalance in the sense that charge shift in the product enol lags behind proton transfer and charge shift in the reactant enol is ahead of proton transfer, The imbalance in the reactions of CH3CH=OH+ is larger than in the reaction of CH3CH=O, and larger for the syn than the anti configuration of CH3CH=OH+. AL the highest level of calculation, the enthalpy difference, Delta H, between the transition Slate and separated reactants is about -5 kcal/mol (anti) and -2 kcal/mol (syn) for the reactions of CH3H=OH+, which compares with Delta H approximate to 0 kcal/mol for the aldehyde reaction. When basis set superposition error corrections are applied, these Delta H values become -2.6, 0.5, and 3.3 kcal/mol, respectively. The trend in these Delta H values can be understood mainly as the result of an interplay between the effect a the increased acidity of the carbon acid, which makes Delta H more negative, and the effect of a large imbalance, which makes Delta H less negative or more positive. Electrostatic or hydrogen-bonding stabilization of the transition state is also likely to play a role by attenuating these effects. Specifically, the lower Delta H for the reactions of CH3CH=OH+ compared to CH3CH=O is attributed to the much stronger acidity of CH3CH=OH+ which more than offsets the effect of the larger imbalance and the loss of electrostatic or hydrogen-bonding stabilization; on the other hand, the higher Delta H for the reaction of CH3CH=OH+ (syn) compared to that of CH3CH=OH+ (anti) can be explained by the dominance of the imbalance factor. The reaction paths through the imbalanced transition states can be represented by means of a six-corner More O'Ferrall-Jencks type diagram with separate axes fur proton transfer and electronic/structural reorganization, The larger imbalance for the reaction of CH3CH=OH+ (syn) compared to CH3CH-OH+ (anti) is consistent with the relative energies of the intermediate corners of the diagram in the two reactions, but this is not the case for the larger imbalance in the reactions of CH3CH=OH+ compared to that of CH3CH=O. This latter discrepancy is probably a consequence of an overinterpretation of the More O'Ferrall-Jencks diagram when applied to large perturbations.
引用
收藏
页码:10494 / 10504
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]  
HEHRE WJ, 1986, AB INITIO MOL ORBITA, P25
[22]   CHARACTERIZATION OF TRANSITION-STATES BY STRUCTURE-REACTIVITY COEFFICIENTS [J].
JENCKS, DA ;
JENCKS, WP .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1977, 99 (24) :7948-7960
[23]  
JENCKS WP, 1985, CHEM REV, V85, P511, DOI 10.1021/cr00070a001
[24]   GENERAL ACID-BASE CATALYSIS OF COMPLEX REACTIONS IN WATER [J].
JENCKS, WP .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 1972, 72 (06) :705-&
[25]   NITROALKANE ANOMALY [J].
KRESGE, AJ .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE CHIMIE, 1974, 52 (10) :1897-1903
[26]   WHAT MAKES PROTON-TRANSFER FAST [J].
KRESGE, AJ .
ACCOUNTS OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH, 1975, 8 (10) :354-360
[27]   APPROXIMATE 4TH-ORDER PERTURBATION-THEORY OF ELECTRON CORRELATION ENERGY [J].
KRISHNAN, R ;
POPLE, JA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUANTUM CHEMISTRY, 1978, 14 (01) :91-100
[28]   CONTRIBUTION OF TRIPLE SUBSTITUTIONS TO THE ELECTRON CORRELATION-ENERGY IN 4TH ORDER PERTURBATION-THEORY [J].
KRISHNAN, R ;
FRISCH, MJ ;
POPLE, JA .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1980, 72 (07) :4244-4245
[29]  
Leffler J. E., 1963, RATES EQUILIBRIA ORG, P156
[30]  
Lias S. G., 1988, J PHYS CHEM REF D S1, V17