Does the frequency of the antecedent noun affect the resolution of pronominal anaphors? An ERP study

被引:16
作者
Heine, A [1 ]
Tamm, S [1 ]
Hofmann, M [1 ]
Hutzler, F [1 ]
Jacobs, AM [1 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Dept Psychol, D-12043 Berlin, Germany
关键词
pronouns; word frequency; salience; event-related potentials (ERP); N400; P300;
D O I
10.1016/j.neulet.2006.02.006
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Behavioral studies investigating the influence of the relative word frequency of antecedent nouns on the processing of anaphoric pronouns have yielded contradictory results. While some researchers found no effect of ail antecedent's frequency of occurrence on coreference resolution [J. Simner. R. Smyth, Phonological activation in anaphoric lexical access (ALA), Brain Lang. 68 (1999) 40-45], others report shorter reading times for pronouns referring to low compared to high frequency nouns [R.G.P. van Gompel, A. Majid, Antecedent frequency effects during the processing of pronouns. Cognition 90 (2004) 255-264]. Using event-related potentials, our study aimed to further investigate the issue. Participants were presented with sentence pairs, of which the first contained either a high frequency, a middle frequency or a low frequency noun. The second sentence contained a pronoun which referred back to the noun in the first sentence. ERP waves were determined, time-locked to both the nouns and the anaphoric pronouns. We observed a graded N400 effect for antecedents of the three frequency classes with amplitudes reversely related to the word's lexical frequency. Coreferential pronouns elicited a P300, with amplitudes dependent on the noun's relative frequency of occurrence, i.e. the lower the antecedent's word frequency, the higher was the amplitude of the P300. This amplitude effect at the pronoun is interpreted in terms of the allocation of attentional resources to salient discourse entities. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 12
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]   Electrophysiological estimates of biological and syntactic gender violation during pronoun processing [J].
Schmitt, BM ;
Lamers, M ;
Münte, TF .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2002, 14 (03) :333-346
[22]   THE ONLINE RESOLUTION OF PRONOMINAL ANAPHORA [J].
SHILLCOCK, R .
LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 1982, 25 (OCT-) :385-401
[23]   Phonological activation in anaphoric lexical access (ALA) [J].
Simner, J ;
Smyth, R .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1999, 68 (1-2) :40-45
[24]   ATTENTIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF AUTOMATIC AND CONTROLLED PROCESSING [J].
STRAYER, DL ;
KRAMER, AF .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1990, 16 (01) :67-82
[25]   Different anaphoric expressions are investigated by event-related brain potentials [J].
Streb, J ;
Hennighausen, E ;
Rösler, F .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2004, 33 (03) :175-201
[26]   Event-related responses to pronoun and proper name anaphors in parallel and nonparallel discourse structures [J].
Streb, J ;
Rösler, F ;
Hennighausen, E .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1999, 70 (02) :273-286
[27]   Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension [J].
van Berkum, JJA ;
Brown, CM ;
Hagoort, P ;
Zwitserlood, P .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 40 (02) :235-248
[28]   Antecedent frequency effects during the processing of pronouns [J].
van Gompel, RPG ;
Majid, A .
COGNITION, 2004, 90 (03) :255-264
[29]   INTERACTIONS BETWEEN SENTENCE CONTEXT AND WORD-FREQUENCY IN EVENT-RELATED BRAIN POTENTIALS [J].
VANPETTEN, C ;
KUTAS, M .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1990, 18 (04) :380-393