Measuring scientific research in emerging nano-energy field

被引:42
作者
Guan, Jiancheng [1 ]
Liu, Na [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Nano-energy; Growth pattern; Scientific influence; Collaborative networks; Cross-countries/regions comparison; Survey; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NANOSCIENCE; COLLABORATION; TECHNOLOGY; IMPACT; OUTPUT;
D O I
10.1007/s11051-014-2356-8
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to comprehensively explore scientific research profiles in the field of emerging nano-energy during 1991-2012 based on bibliometrics and social network analysis. We investigate the growth pattern of research output, and then carry out across countries/regions comparisons on research performances. Furthermore, we examine scientific collaboration across countries/regions by analyzing collaborative intensity and networks in 3- to 4-year intervals. Results indicate with an impressively exponential growth pattern of nano-energy articles, the world share of scientific "giants," such as the USA, Germany, England, France and Japan, display decreasing research trends, especially in the USA. Emerging economies, including China, South Korea and India, exhibit a rise in terms of the world share, illustrating strong development momentum of these countries in nano-energy research. Strikingly, China displays a remarkable rise in scientific influence rivaling Germany, Japan, France, and England in the last few years. Finally, the scientific collaborative network in nano-energy research has expanded steadily. Although the USA and several major European countries play significantly roles on scientific collaboration, China and South Korea exert great influence on scientific collaboration in recent years. The findings imply that emerging economies can earn competitive advantages in some emerging fields by properly engaging a catch-up strategy.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [11] Nanotechnology and clean energy: sustainable utilization and supply of critical materials
    Fromer, Neil A.
    Diallo, Mamadou S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (11)
  • [12] The impact of network embeddedness on research output
    Gonzalez-Brambila, Claudia N.
    Veloso, Francisco M.
    Krackhardt, David
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2013, 42 (09) : 1555 - 1567
  • [13] Comparison and evaluation of Chinese research performance in the field of bioinformatics
    Guan, Jiancheng
    Gao, Xia
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2008, 75 (02) : 357 - 379
  • [14] Green nanotechnology of trends in future energy: a review
    Guo, Kelvii Wei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2012, 36 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [15] An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
    Hirsch, JE
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (46) : 16569 - 16572
  • [16] Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies
    Huang, Can
    Notten, Ad
    Rasters, Nico
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2011, 36 (02) : 145 - 172
  • [17] Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective
    Li, Eldon Y.
    Liao, Chien Hsiang
    Yen, Hsiuju Rebecca
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2013, 42 (09) : 1515 - 1530
  • [18] Profile of developments in biomass-based bioenergy research: a 20-year perspective
    Liu, Weishu
    Gu, Mengdi
    Hu, Guangyuan
    Li, Chao
    Liao, Huchang
    Tang, Li
    Shapira, Philip
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2014, 99 (02) : 507 - 521
  • [19] Mahapatra M., 1985, Proceedings of the 15th IASLIC Conference, Bangalore, P61
  • [20] Bibliometric analysis of global publication output and collaboration structure study in microRNA research
    Mallik, Ajoy
    Mandal, Nripendranath
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2014, 98 (03) : 2011 - 2037