Comparison between a basal-bolus and a premixed insulin regimen in individuals with type 2 diabetes-results of the GINGER study

被引:90
作者
Fritsche, A. [1 ]
Larbig, M. [2 ]
Owens, D. [3 ]
Haering, H.-U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, Med Univ Klin, Abt Endokrinol Stoffwechsel & Pathobiochem, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Sanofi Aventis, Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Llandough, Diabet Res Unit, Vale Of Glamorgan, Germany
关键词
basal-bolus; insulin glargine; insulin glulisine; premixed insulin; PROTAMINE HAGEDORN INSULIN; TWICE-DAILY REGIMEN; NPH INSULIN; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; TIMES; GLARGINE; THERAPY; ANALOG; HYPOGLYCEMIA; MELLITUS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01165.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of an intensified insulin regimen, using insulin glargine (glargine) once daily and pre-meal insulin glulisine (glulisine) (basal-bolus), with a conventional therapy, using premixed insulin (premix) twice daily. Methods: This 52-week, open-label, randomized, multinational, multicentre trial included 310 subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) on premix, with or without metformin, who were randomized to a basal-bolus regimen with glargine and glulisine (n = 153; mean +/- s.d. age 60.2 +/- 7.5 years; HbA1c 8.6 +/- 0.8%; weight 87.0 +/- 15.1 kg; T2D duration 12.8 +/- 5.8 years) or twice-daily premix (n = 157; age 60.9 +/- 7.8 years; HbA1c 8.5 +/- 0.9%; weight 84.3 +/- 15.0 kg; T2D duration 12.5 +/- 6.8 years). The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to endpoint. Results: Mean decrease in baseline-to-endpoint HbA1c for basal-bolus vs. premix was -1.31 vs. -0.80% (difference: -0.476%; 95% Cl: -0.714, -0.238; p = 0.0001, ancova). More subjects reached HbA1c < 7.0% in the basal-bolus group than in the premix group [68 (46.6%) vs. 43 (27.9%); p = 0.0004], while they also experienced significantly lower mean +/- s.d. daytime (-2.7 +/- 2.3 vs. -2.3 +/- 2.5 mmol/l; p = 0.0033) and postprandial (-3.1 +/- 2.6 vs. -2.5 +/- 2.8 mmol/l; p < 0.0001) blood glucose. Endpoint daily insulin doses were 98.0 +/- 48.7 vs. 91.3 +/- 44.3 IU (p = 0.2104); mean weight gain was +3.6 +/- 4.0 vs. +2.2 +/- 4.5 kg (p = 0.0073). Mean number of overall hypoglycaemic events with basal-bolus and premix was 13.99 and 18.54 events/patient year, respectively (difference: -3.90; 95% CI: -10.40, 2.60; p = 0.2385). Conclusions: An intensified basal-bolus regimen using glargine/glulisine results in a significantly superior glycaemic control vs. premix therapy in a population with long-standing insulin-treated T2D, with no increase in the rates of hypoglycaemia.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 123
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[31]   Biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 three times a day in older patients with type 2 diabetes not achieving optimal glycemic control on a twice-daily regimen: A retrospective case series analysis from clinical practice [J].
Tibaldi, Joseph T. .
ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2007, 24 (06) :1348-1356
[32]   The use of fixed-mixture insulins in clinical practice [J].
Turner, HE ;
Matthews, DR .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2000, 56 (01) :19-25
[33]   Biphasic insulin aspart 30 three times daily is more effective than a twice-daily regimen, without increasing hypoglycemia, in Chinese subjects with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetes drugs [J].
Yang, Wenying ;
Ji, Qiuhe ;
Zhu, Dalong ;
Yang, Jinkui ;
Chen, Lulu ;
Liu, Zhimin ;
Yu, Demin ;
Yan, Li .
DIABETES CARE, 2008, 31 (05) :852-856
[34]   Insulin glargine or NPH combined with metformin in type 2 diabetes:: the LANMET study [J].
Yki-Järvinen, H ;
Kauppinen-Mäkelin, R ;
Tiikkainen, M ;
Vähätalo, M ;
Virtamo, H ;
Nikkilä, K ;
Tulokas, T ;
Hulme, S ;
Hardy, K ;
McNulty, S ;
Hänninen, J ;
Levänen, H ;
Lahdenperä, S ;
Lehtonen, R ;
Ryysy, L .
DIABETOLOGIA, 2006, 49 (03) :442-451