Psychometric properties of vision-related quality of life questionnaires:: a systematic review

被引:204
作者
de Boer, MR
Moll, AC
de Vet, HCW
Terwee, CB
Völker-Dieben, HJM
van Rens, GHMB
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Inst Res Extramural Med, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Elkerliek Hosp, Helmond, Netherlands
关键词
eye diseases; psychometric properties; quality of life; questionnaires; review; visual impairment;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00187.x
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
The increased attention for quality of life (QOL) as an outcome measure has led to the development of numerous questionnaires to assess this construct in the field of ophthalmology. This article presents a systematic review on QOL questionnaires for people with vision impairments. We systematically searched and selected the literature. Furthermore, a rating list with descriptive aspects (e.g. target population) and psychometric aspects (e.g. reproducibility) was developed. The 31 questionnaires that were included in the review were rated on the basis of criteria stated in this rating list. The questionnaires were mostly targeted at cataract patients or visually impaired persons in general. Only a few of the questionnaires demonstrated sufficient psychometric quality. A recent development is the (re-)evaluation of questionnaires with Rasch analysis. This is one of the most important issues to which future research in this field should be directed.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 273
页数:17
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
Aaronson N K, 1988, Oncology (Williston Park), V2, P69
[2]   International applicability of the VF-14 - An index of visual function in patients with cataracts [J].
Alonso, J ;
Espallargues, M ;
Anderson, TF ;
Cassard, SD ;
Dunn, E ;
BernthPetersen, P ;
Norregaard, JC ;
Black, C ;
Steinberg, EP ;
Anderson, GF .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1997, 104 (05) :799-807
[3]   Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research [J].
Andresen, EM .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2000, 81 (12) :S15-S20
[4]   RATING FORMULATION FOR ORDERED RESPONSE CATEGORIES [J].
ANDRICH, D .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1978, 43 (04) :561-573
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Oceanography, DOI [10.5670/oceanog.2001.08, DOI 10.5670/OCEANOG.2001.08]
[6]   A taxonomy for responsiveness [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Bombardier, C ;
Katz, JN ;
Wright, JG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 54 (12) :1204-1217
[7]   Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Boers, M ;
Wells, GA .
CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2002, 14 (02) :109-114
[8]   AN INSTRUMENT TO MEASURE THE ACTIVITY LEVEL OF THE BLIND [J].
BECKER, SW ;
LAMBERT, RW ;
SCHULZ, EM ;
WRIGHT, BD ;
BURNET, DL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 1985, 8 (04) :415-424
[9]   Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness [J].
Beckerman, H ;
Roebroeck, ME ;
Lankhorst, GJ ;
Becher, JG ;
Bezemer, PD ;
Verbeek, ALM .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (07) :571-578
[10]  
BERNTHPETERSEN P, 1981, ACTA OPHTHALMOL, V59, P198