Pairwise difference analysis in modern human origins research

被引:4
作者
Collard, M [1 ]
Franchino, N [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Anthropol, London WC1E 6BT, England
关键词
modern human origins; pairwise difference analysis; hominoid; primate; hominid; craniodental; soft tissue; morphology;
D O I
10.1006/jhev.2002.0578
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
Pairwise difference analysis is a phenetic method that groups taxa on the basis of the number of differences they exhibit. Recently, pairwise difference analysis has been used to investigate the phylogenetic relationships of hominid fossils at the centre of the modem human origins debate. It has been argued that the results of these analyses disprove the African replacement model of modem human origins, and support instead its competitor, the multiregional evolution model. However, this inference is problematic because the ability of pairwise difference analysis to recover phylogenetic information from morphological data has not been demonstrated. With this in mind, we conducted pairwise difference analyses of craniodental and soft tissue evidence from a group of extant primates for which a reliable molecular phylogeny is' available, the hominoids. We found that the phylogenies yielded by the pairwise difference analyses were incompatible with the molecular phylogeny for the group. Given the molecular phylogeny, these results suggest that robustness of the mol pairwise difference analysis cannot be relied on to generate reliable estimates of primate phylogeny from morphological data. The corollary of this is that the results of published pairwise difference analyses of hominid fossils are not informative regarding the origin of modern humans. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 352
页数:30
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   THE FOSSIL EVIDENCE FOR MODERN HUMAN ORIGINS IN AFRICA - A REVISED VIEW [J].
AIELLO, LC .
AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST, 1993, 95 (01) :73-96
[2]  
[Anonymous], CONTINUITY REPLACEME
[3]  
Brauer G., 1992, CONTINUITY REPLACEME, P83
[4]  
Brauer G., 1997, CONCEPTUAL ISSUES MO, P191
[5]  
CANN RL, 1987, NATURE, V329, P111, DOI 10.1038/329111c0
[6]  
Churchill SE, 2000, YEARB PHYS ANTHROPOL, V43, P61
[7]   Neandertal archaeology - Implications for our origins [J].
Clark, GA .
AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST, 2002, 104 (01) :50-67
[8]   How reliable are human phylogenetic hypotheses? [J].
Collard, M ;
Wood, B .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2000, 97 (09) :5003-5006
[9]   CANONICAL AND PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS OF SHAPE [J].
DARROCH, JN ;
MOSIMANN, JE .
BIOMETRIKA, 1985, 72 (02) :241-252
[10]   THEORIES OF MODERN HUMAN ORIGINS - THE PALEONTOLOGICAL TEST [J].
FRAYER, DW ;
WOLPOFF, MH ;
THORNE, AG ;
SMITH, FH ;
POPE, GG .
AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST, 1993, 95 (01) :14-50