Ancient origins of axial patterning genes: Hox genes and ParaHox genes in the Cnidaria

被引:98
作者
Finnerty, JR [1 ]
Martindale, MQ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Organismal Biol & Anat, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1525-142x.1999.99010.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Among the bilaterally symmetrical, triploblastic animals (the Bilateria), a conserved set of developmental regulatory genes are known to function in patterning the anterior-posterior (AP) axis. This set includes the well-studied Hox cluster genes, and the recently described genes of the ParaHox cluster, which is believed to be the evolutionary sister of the Hox cluster ( Brooke et al. 1998). The conserved role of these axial patterning genes in animals as diverse as frogs and flies is believed to reflect an underlying homology (i.e., all bilaterians derive from a common ancestor which possessed an AP axis and the developmental mechanisms responsible for patterning the axis). However, the origin and early evolution of Hox genes and ParaHox genes remain obscure. Repeated attempts have been made to reconstruct the early evolution of Hox genes by analyzing data from the triphoblastic animals, the Bilateria (Schubert et al. 1993; Zhang and Nei 1996). A more precise dating of Hox origins has been elusive due to a lack of sufficient information from outgroup taxa such as the phylum Cnidaria (corals, hydras, jellyfishes, and sea anemones). In combination with outgroup taxa, another potential source of information about Hox origins is outgroup genes (e.g., the genes of the ParaHox cluster). In this article, we present cDNA sequences of two Hox-like genes (anthox2 and anthox6) from the sea anemone, Nematostella vectensis. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that anthox2 (=Cnox2) is homologous to the GSX class of ParaHox genes, and anthox6 is homologous to the anterior class of Hox genes. Therefore, the origin of Hox genes and ParaHox genes occurred prior to the evolutionary split between the Cnidaria and the Bilateria and predated the evolution of the anterior-posterior axis of bilaterian animals. Our analysis also suggests that the central Hox class was invented in the bilaterian lineage, subsequent to their split from the Cnidaria.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 23
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [21] DETECTION OF HOMEOBOX GENES IN DEVELOPMENT AND EVOLUTION
    MURTHA, MT
    LECKMAN, JF
    RUDDLE, FH
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1991, 88 (23) : 10711 - 10715
  • [22] PRESENCE OF 8 DISTINCT HOMEOBOX-CONTAINING GENES IN CNIDARIANS
    NAITO, M
    ISHIGURO, H
    FUJISAWA, T
    KUROSAWA, Y
    [J]. FEBS LETTERS, 1993, 333 (03) : 271 - 274
  • [23] THE NEIGHBOR-JOINING METHOD - A NEW METHOD FOR RECONSTRUCTING PHYLOGENETIC TREES
    SAITOU, N
    NEI, M
    [J]. MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 1987, 4 (04) : 406 - 425
  • [24] HOMEOBOXES IN CNIDARIANS
    SCHIERWATER, B
    MURTHA, M
    DICK, M
    RUDDLE, FH
    BUSS, LW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY, 1991, 260 (03): : 413 - 416
  • [25] Homology of Hox genes and the zootype concept in early metazoan evolution
    Schierwater, B
    Kuhn, K
    [J]. MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 1998, 9 (03) : 375 - 381
  • [26] THE ANTENNAPEDIA-TYPE HOMEOBOX GENES HAVE EVOLVED FROM 3 PRECURSORS SEPARATED EARLY IN METAZOAN EVOLUTION
    SCHUBERT, FR
    NIESELTSTRUWE, K
    GRUSS, P
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1993, 90 (01) : 143 - 147
  • [27] HOM HOX HOMEOBOX GENES ARE PRESENT IN HYDRA (CHLOROHYDRA-VIRIDISSIMA) AND ARE DIFFERENTIALLY EXPRESSED DURING REGENERATION
    SCHUMMER, M
    SCHEURLEN, I
    SCHALLER, C
    GALLIOT, B
    [J]. EMBO JOURNAL, 1992, 11 (05) : 1815 - 1823
  • [28] EXPRESSION OF CNOX-2, A HOM/HOX GENE, IS SUPPRESSED DURING HEAD FORMATION IN HYDRA
    SHENK, MA
    GEE, L
    STEELE, RE
    BODE, HR
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 1993, 160 (01) : 108 - 118
  • [29] SHENK MA, 1993, DEVELOPMENT, V117, P657
  • [30] When is homology not homology?
    Wray, GA
    Abouheif, E
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 1998, 8 (06) : 675 - 680