Bumblebees experience landscapes at different spatial scales: possible implications for coexistence

被引:212
作者
Westphal, Catrin [1 ]
Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf [1 ]
Tscharntke, Teja [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Dept Agroecol, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
Bombus spp; pollination; foraging ranges; coexistence; resource partitioning;
D O I
10.1007/s00442-006-0448-6
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Coexistence in bumblebee communities has largely been investigated at local spatial scales. However, local resource partitioning does not fully explain the species diversity of bumblebee communities. Theoretical studies provide new evidence that partitioning of space can promote species coexistence, when species interact with their environment at different spatial scales. If bumblebee species possess specific foraging ranges, different spatial resource utilisation patterns might operate as an additional mechanism of coexistence in bumblebee communities. We investigated the effects of the landscape-wide availability of different resources (mass flowering crops and semi-natural habitats) on the local densities of four bumblebee species at 12 spatial scales (landscape sectors with 250-3,000 m radius) to indirectly identify the spatial scales at which the bumblebees perceive their environment. The densities of all bumblebee species were enhanced in landscapes with high proportions of mass flowering crops (mainly oilseed rape). We found the strongest effects for Bombus terrestris agg. and Bombus lapidarius at large spatial scales, implying foraging distances of 3,000 and 2,750 m, respectively. The densities of Bombus pascuorum were most strongly influenced at a medium spatial scale (1,000 m), and of Bombus pratorum (with marginal significance) at a small spatial scale (250 m). The estimated foraging ranges tended to be related to body and colony sizes, indicating that larger species travel over larger distances than smaller species, presumably enabling them to build up larger colonies through a better exploitation of food resources. We conclude that coexistence in bumblebee communities could potentially be mediated by species-specific differences in the spatial resource utilisation patterns, which should be considered in conservation schemes.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 300
页数:12
相关论文
共 71 条
[31]   RESOURCE PARTITIONING AMONG SOME EUSOCIAL INSECTS - BUMBLEBEES [J].
HEINRICH, B .
ECOLOGY, 1976, 57 (05) :874-889
[32]  
Heinrich B., 1979, Bumblebee Economics
[33]   Foraging decisions in nectarivores: unexpected interactions between flower constancy and energetic rewards [J].
Hill, PSM ;
Hollis, J ;
Wells, H .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2001, 62 :729-737
[34]   RESOURCE PARTITIONING IN BUMBLEBEES - EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF FORAGING BEHAVIOR [J].
INOUYE, DW .
ECOLOGY, 1978, 59 (04) :672-678
[35]   CONTRASTING FORAGING STRATEGIES AND COEXISTENCE OF 2 BEE SPECIES ON A SINGLE RESOURCE [J].
JOHNSON, LK ;
HUBBELL, SP .
ECOLOGY, 1975, 56 (06) :1398-1406
[36]   Endangered mutualisms: The conservation of plant-pollinator interactions [J].
Kearns, CA ;
Inouye, DW ;
Waser, NM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1998, 29 :83-112
[37]   Preferred nesting sites of bumblebee queens (Hymenoptera:Apidae) in agroecosystems in the UK [J].
Kells, AR ;
Goulson, D .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2003, 109 (02) :165-174
[38]   Trade-offs in community ecology: linking spatial scales and species coexistence [J].
Kneitel, JM ;
Chase, JM .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2004, 7 (01) :69-80
[39]   ENVIRONMENTAL HETEROGENEITY AND THE COEXISTENCE OF DESERT RODENTS [J].
KOTLER, BP ;
BROWN, JS .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1988, 19 :281-307
[40]  
Mauss V., 1996, BESTIMMUNGSSCHLUSSEL