A stochastic approach for sustainability analysis under the green economics paradigm

被引:21
作者
Ahi, Payman [1 ]
Searcy, Cory [1 ]
机构
[1] Ryerson Univ, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Sustainability; Green economics; Environmental indicators; Performance measurement; Strong sustainability; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; INDEXES; PERFORMANCE; INDICATOR; INTEGRITY; FRAMEWORK; COMPANIES; SYSTEMS; EQUITY; WEAK;
D O I
10.1007/s00477-013-0836-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainability is an increasingly important factor in today's globally competitive environment. How sustainability features are prioritized in terms of relevance and significance is a function of many factors, including variations in types of business, operational conditions, history and other characteristics particular to a company. The purpose of this paper is to propose a stochastic model that explicitly addresses the potential barriers and enablers to sustainability in order to measure and assess the sustainability level of a company. Given that the potential barriers and enablers to sustainability are context dependent, the stochastic model developed in this paper assumes that a variable characterization of sustainability functions can describe a realistic analytical model for a company's sustainability behavior. By adopting the strong sustainability perspective, a case scenario is used to demonstrate the application of the proposed model in a major Canadian electric utility. By providing relatively simple and informative measurement, the proposed sustainability model can be used as a practical and effective tool to assess the sustainability level of any company under consideration and to evaluate sustainability fluctuation of the company over time.
引用
收藏
页码:1743 / 1753
页数:11
相关论文
共 74 条
[21]   Weak and strong sustainability in the SEEA: Concepts and measurement [J].
Dietz, Simon ;
Neumayer, Eric .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 61 (04) :617-626
[23]   Meaningful environmental indices: a social choice approach [J].
Ebert, U ;
Welsch, H .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 47 (02) :270-283
[24]   Facility-level energy and greenhouse gas life-cycle assessment of the global nickel industry [J].
Eckelman, Matthew J. .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2010, 54 (04) :256-266
[25]   Actual land demand of Austria 1926-2000: a variation on Ecological Footprint assessments [J].
Erb, KH .
LAND USE POLICY, 2004, 21 (03) :247-259
[26]   Comparing emergy accounting with well-known sustainability metrics: The case of Southern Cone Common Market, Mercosur [J].
Giannetti, B. F. ;
Almeida, C. M. V. B. ;
Bonilla, S. H. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (07) :3518-3526
[27]   Toward a new welfare economics for sustainability [J].
Gowdy, J .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 53 (02) :211-222
[28]  
Gutes MC, 1996, ECOL ECON, V17, P147
[29]  
HARTWICK JM, 1977, AM ECON REV, V67, P972
[30]   An approach for the application of the Ecological Footprint as environmental indicator in the textile sector [J].
Herva, M. ;
Franco, A. ;
Ferreiro, S. ;
Alvarez, A. ;
Roca, E. .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2008, 156 (1-3) :478-487