Determination of selectivity differences for basic compounds in gradient reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography under high pH conditions by partial least squares modelling

被引:11
作者
Fornal, Emilia
Borman, Phil
Luscombe, Christopher
机构
[1] GlaxoSmithKline, Strateg Techynol, Chem Dev, Stevenage SG1 2NY, Herts, England
[2] John Paul II Catholic Univ Lublin, Dept Biochem & Environm Chem, PL-20718 Lublin, Poland
[3] GlaxoSmithKline, Data Management, Discovery Res, Stevenage SG1 2NY, Herts, England
关键词
reverse phase high pH liquid chromatography; pharmaceutical analysis; principal component analysis; partial least squares analysis; selectivity differences between chromatographic systems;
D O I
10.1016/j.aca.2006.04.027
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The retention behaviour of compounds in a chromatographic system is believed to be multivariate by nature, i.e. many physico-chemical properties of an analyte can influence its retention. Principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares (PLS) can therefore be particularly useful tools for visualising, exploring and modelling the complex interactions between solutes and the mobile and stationary phase. PCA allows the relationships between compounds (the observations) and their retention parameters (the variables) to be visualised in usually just two or three dimensions. PLS can be used to model quantitative structure-retention relationships (QSRRs) and may lead to better understanding of retention and selectivity changes in chromatographic systems. The objective of the study was to investigate the chromatographic behaviour of basic compounds under optimised gradient conditions using octadecyl high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) columns designed for high pH separations. Three pharmaceutical mixtures were analysed by linear gradient reverse phase HPLC (RP-HPLC) at high pH using ammonia as a pH modifier, and methanol and/or acetonitrile as the organic modifier. The separations were carried out on three octadecyl columns: Waters XTerra MS C 18, Agilent Zorbax Extend C 18 and Thermo Hypersil-Keystone BetaBasic-18. Multivariate PCA and PLS modelling were employed to explore and explain the differences in selectivity between the chromatographic systems studied when the basic compounds were analysed under the high pH conditions. The interactions between the analytes and the mobile-stationary phases were described by relating the compound molecular descriptors with the selectivity of each chromatographic system. The selectivity differences between the chromatographic systems were identified. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All fights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 276
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[2]  
Baczek T, 2003, J CHROMATOGR A, V987, P29
[3]  
Brereton R.G., 2003, DATA ANAL LAB CHEM P
[4]   Rationalisation of unusual changes in efficiency and retention with temperature shown for bases in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography at intermediate pH [J].
Buckenmaier, SMC ;
McCalley, DV ;
Euerby, MR .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2004, 1060 (1-2) :117-126
[5]  
David E. Clark, 1999, J PHARM SCI, V88, P815
[6]   Chemometric comparison of recent chromatographic and electrophoretic methods in a quantitative structure-retention and retention-activity relationship context [J].
Detroyer, A ;
Heyden, YV ;
Cambré, I ;
Massart, DL .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2003, 986 (02) :227-238
[7]   Comparison of retention of aromatic hydrocarbons with polar groups in binary reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography systems [J].
Dzido, TH ;
Kossowski, TE ;
Matosiuk, D .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2002, 947 (02) :167-183
[8]   Cluster-based design in environmental QSAR [J].
Eriksson, L ;
Johansson, E ;
Müller, M ;
Wold, S .
QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS, 1997, 16 (05) :383-390
[9]  
Eriksson L., 2013, MULTI MEGAVARIATE DA
[10]   Optimization strategies for the analysis and purification of drug discovery compounds by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with high-pH mobile phases [J].
Espada, A ;
Marín, A ;
Anta, C .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2004, 1030 (1-2) :43-51