Change in soil organic carbon following afforestation of former arable land

被引:345
作者
Vesterdal, L [1 ]
Ritter, E [1 ]
Gundersen, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Danish Forest & Landscape Res Inst, Dept Forest Ecol, DK-2970 Horsholm, Denmark
关键词
carbon sequestration; forest floor; mineral soil; land-use change; afforestation; chronosequence; oak; Norway spruce;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00304-3
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
The resolution of the Kyoto Protocol to include effects of land use and land-use change in global carbon budgets has put focus on C sequestration following afforestation of former arable land. Carbon is sequestered in the aggrading biomass of the new forests, but the question remains, to what extent the former arable soils will contribute as sinks for CO2. The present study explored changes in soil C stores following afforestation of former arable land with oak (Quercus robur L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). Seven stands of each tree species on nutrient-rich soils made up a chronosequence ranging from 1 to 29 years. An adjacent similar to200-year-old mixed deciduous plantation was included to give information on the possible long term changes in soil C. Soil sampling included organic layers and three layers of the mineral soil to a depth of 25 cm. Development of forest floors sequestered most C in spruce stands. While oak stands sequestered around 2 Mg C ha(-1), spruce stands sequestered approximately 9 Mg C ha(-1) in forest floors over 29 years. There were no differences between the two tree species in C concentration and storage of the three mineral soil layers. Carbon concentration and storage increased in the upper 5 cm of the mineral soil but decreased in the 5-15 and 15-25 cm soil layers with increasing stand age. The soil C store appeared to be undergoing redistribution following afforestation, and mineral soil C stores in 0-25 cm tended to decrease over the 29-year period. Together with the C sequestration of forest floors, this led to fairly similar total soil C stores of around 65 Mg ha(-1) along the 29-year chronosequence. Within this short time span, C sequestration mainly occurred in the biomass of trees while soil C stores were clearly higher in the similar to200-year-old plantation (81 Mg C ha(-1)). The ongoing redistribution of mineral soil C in the young stands and the higher soil C contents in the similar to200-year-old afforested stand suggest that nutrient-rich afforestation soils may become greater sinks for C in long term. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 147
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]   Rapid accumulation and turnover of soil carbon in a re-establishing forest [J].
Richter, DD ;
Markewitz, D ;
Trumbore, SE ;
Wells, CG .
NATURE, 1999, 400 (6739) :56-58
[22]   SOIL CHEMICAL-CHANGE DURING 3 DECADES IN AN OLD-FIELD LOBLOLLY-PINE (PINUS-TAEDA L) ECOSYSTEM [J].
RICHTER, DD ;
MARKEWITZ, D ;
WELLS, CG ;
ALLEN, HL ;
APRIL, R ;
HEINE, PR ;
URREGO, B .
ECOLOGY, 1994, 75 (05) :1463-1473
[23]   Soil organic matter dynamics after the conversion of arable land to pasture [J].
Römkens, PFAM ;
van der Plicht, J ;
Hassink, J .
BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 1999, 28 (03) :277-284
[24]  
SAS Institute, 1993, SAS STAT US GUID REL
[25]   PHYTOMASS AND DETRITAL CARBON STORAGE DURING FOREST REGROWTH IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED-STATES PIEDMONT [J].
SCHIFFMAN, PM ;
JOHNSON, WC .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1989, 19 (01) :69-78
[26]   SOIL ORGANIC-MATTER DYNAMICS IN PAIRED RANGELAND AND CROPLAND TOPOSEQUENCES IN NORTH-DAKOTA [J].
SCHIMEL, DS ;
COLEMAN, DC ;
HORTON, KA .
GEODERMA, 1985, 36 (3-4) :201-214
[27]  
Schone D., 1999, Forstarchiv, V70, P167
[28]  
Soil Survey Staff, 1992, SMSS TECHN MON
[29]   Mineral control of soil organic carbon storage and turnover [J].
Torn, MS ;
Trumbore, SE ;
Chadwick, OA ;
Vitousek, PM ;
Hendricks, DM .
NATURE, 1997, 389 (6647) :170-173
[30]   Forest floor chemistry under seven tree species along a soil fertility gradient [J].
Vesterdal, L ;
Raulund-Rasmussen, K .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 1998, 28 (11) :1636-1647