Author productivity and geodesic distance in bibliographic co-authorship networks, and visibility on the Web

被引:92
作者
Kretschmer, H
机构
[1] COLLNET, D-16540 Hohen Neuendorf, Germany
[2] Royal Netherlands Acad Arts & Sci, Nerdi, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034383.86665.22
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The increasing cooperation in science, which has led to larger co-authorship networks, requires the application of new methods of analysis of social networks in bibliographic co-authorship networks as well as in networks visible on the Web. In this context, a number of interesting papers on the "Erdos Number", which gives the shortest path (geodesic distance) between an author and the well-known Hungarian mathematician Erdos in a co-authorship network, have been published recently. This paper develops new methods concerning the position of highly productive authors in the network. Thus a relationship of distribution of these authors among the clusters in the co-authorship network could be proved to be dependent upon the size of the clusters. Highly productive authors have, on average, low geodesic distances and thus shorter length of paths to all the other authors of a specialism compared to low productive authors, whereas the influencing possibility of highly productive scientists gets distributed amongst others in the development of the specialism. A theory on the stratification in science with respect to the over random similarity of scientists collaborating with one another, previously covered with other empirical methods, could also be confirmed by the application of geodesic distances. The paper proposes that the newly developed methodology may also be applied to visible networks in future studies on the Web. Further investigation is warranted into whether co-authorship and web networks have similar structures with regards to author productivity and geodesic distances.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 420
页数:12
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, GLEICH GLEICH GESELL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL
[3]  
[Anonymous], J INFORM SCI
[4]   EDITORS OF MEDICAL JOURNALS - WHO AND FROM WHERE [J].
BAKKER, P ;
RIGTER, H .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1985, 7 (1-2) :11-22
[5]   Co-authorship, rational Erdos numbers, and resistance distances in graphs [J].
Balaban, AT ;
Klein, DJ .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2002, 55 (01) :59-70
[6]   DIRECT AND INDIRECT METHODS FOR STRUCTURAL EQUIVALENCE [J].
BATAGELJ, V ;
FERLIGOJ, A ;
DOREIAN, P .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 1992, 14 (1-2) :63-90
[7]   Percolation as a model for informetric distributions: Fragment size distribution characterised by Bradford curves [J].
Bogaert, J ;
Rousseau, R ;
Van Hecke, P .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2000, 47 (02) :195-206
[8]   Publication and cooperation patterns of the authors of neuroscience journals [J].
Braun, T ;
Glänzel, W ;
Schubert, A .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2001, 51 (03) :499-510
[9]  
CZERWON HJ, 1993, DTSCH DOKUMENTARTAG, P625
[10]   Investigating the concentration within a research community using joint publications and co-authorship via intermediaries [J].
Genest, C ;
Thibault, C .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2001, 51 (02) :429-440