Early positron emission tomography (PET) restaging: a predictive final response in Hodgkin's disease patients

被引:116
作者
Zinzani, P. L.
Tani, M.
Fanti, S.
Alinari, L.
Musuraca, G.
Marchi, E.
Stefoni, V.
Castellucci, P.
Fina, M.
Farshad, M.
Pileri, S.
Baccarani, M.
机构
[1] St Orsola Marcello Malpighi Hosp, Ist Ematol & Oncol Med L&A Seragnoli, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
[2] St Orsola Hosp, Bologna, Italy
关键词
chemotherapy; early response; HD; PET;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdl122
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: It is important to distinguish between responders to standard treatment and non-responders Hodgkin's disease (HD) patients. Patients and Methods: Between June 2003-September 2004, in our institute, 40 newly-diagnosed patients with advanced stage HD were consecutively treated with ABVD chemotherapy for six cycles. All these patients underwent staging/restaging: computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) at time 0, PET after two cycles, CT and PET after four and six cycles. Results: After two cycles (PET-2), the PET was negative in 28/40 (70%), positive in 8/40 (20%), and minimal residual uptake (MRU) was present in the remaining four (10%) patients. After treatment, among eight patients who were PET-2+, seven showed refractory disease and one had relapse after 3 months. All four patients with MRU at the PET-2 became PET_ during the further four cycles and, after treatment, three were in complete response (CR) and one relapsed after 5 months. All 28 PET negative patients at the PET-2 remained PET negative and all of them were in CR after treatment. Conclusions: The PET use for early (after two cycles) response assessment in HD patients is a significant step forward and has the potential to help physicians make crucial decisions about further treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:1296 / 1300
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas [J].
Cheson, BD ;
Horning, SJ ;
Coiffier, B ;
Shipp, MA ;
Fisher, RI ;
Connors, JM ;
Lister, TA ;
Vose, J ;
Grillo-López, A ;
Hagenbeek, A ;
Cabanillas, F ;
Klippensten, D ;
Hiddemann, W ;
Castellino, R ;
Harris, NL ;
Armitage, JO ;
Carter, W ;
Hoppe, R ;
Canellos, GP .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (04) :1244-1253
[2]   18FDG-PET following treatment as valid predictor for disease-free survival in Hodgkin's lymphoma [J].
de Wit, M ;
Bohuslavizki, KH ;
Buchert, R ;
Bumann, D ;
Clausen, M ;
Hossfeld, DK .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2001, 12 (01) :29-37
[3]   FDG-PET is superior to gallium scintigraphy in staging and more sensitive in the follow-up of patients with de novo hodgkin lymphoma:: A blinded comparison [J].
Friedberg, JW ;
Fischman, A ;
Neuberg, D ;
Kim, H ;
Takvorian, T ;
Ng, AK ;
Mauch, PM ;
Canellos, GP ;
Van den Abbeele, AD .
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 2004, 45 (01) :85-92
[4]   The clinical value of tumor burden at diagnosis in Hodgkin lymphoma [J].
Gobbi, PG ;
Broglia, C ;
Di Giulio, G ;
Mantelli, M ;
Anselmo, P ;
Merli, F ;
Zinzani, PL ;
Rossi, G ;
Callea, V ;
Iannitto, E ;
Paulli, M ;
Garioni, L ;
Ascari, E .
CANCER, 2004, 101 (08) :1824-1834
[5]   A prognostic score for advanced Hodgkin's disease [J].
Hasenclever, D ;
Diehl, V .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (21) :1506-1514
[6]   Prognostic value of interim FDG-PET after two or three cycles of chemotherapy in Hodgkin lymphoma [J].
Hutchings, M ;
Mikhaeel, NG ;
Fields, PA ;
Nunan, T ;
Timothy, AR .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2005, 16 (07) :1160-1168
[7]   FDG-PET after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts treatment failure and progression-free survival in Hodgkin lymphoma [J].
Hutchings, M ;
Loft, A ;
Hansen, M ;
Pedersen, LM ;
Buhl, T ;
Jurlander, J ;
Buus, S ;
Keiding, S ;
D'Amore, F ;
Boesen, AM ;
Berthelsen, AK ;
Specht, L .
BLOOD, 2006, 107 (01) :52-59
[8]  
Jerusalem G, 2000, HAEMATOLOGICA, V85, P613
[9]  
Jerusalem G, 2001, HAEMATOLOGICA, V86, P266
[10]  
Kostakoglu L, 2002, J NUCL MED, V43, P1018