Conserving mobile species

被引:384
作者
Runge, Claire A. [1 ]
Martini, Tara G. [1 ,2 ]
Possingham, Hugh P. [1 ,3 ]
Willis, Stephen G. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Fuller, Richard A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Commonwealth Sci & Ind Res Org CSIRO Ecosyst Sci, Climate Adaptat Flagship, Dutton Pk, Australia
[3] Imperial Coll London, Dept Life Sci, Ascot, Berks, England
[4] Univ Durham, Sch Biol & Biomed Sci, Durham, England
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
CLIMATE-CHANGE; PROTECTED AREAS; HABITAT LOSS; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; CONNECTIVITY; MODELS; CONSEQUENCES; ASSESSMENTS; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1890/130237
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The distributions of many species are dynamic in space and time, and movements made by individuals range from regular and predictable migrations to erratic, resource-driven nomadism. Conserving such mobile species is challenging; the effectiveness of a conservation action taken at one site depends on the condition of other sites that may be geographically and politically distant (thousands of kilometers away or in another jurisdiction, for example). Recent work has shown that even simple and predictable linkages among sites caused by "to-and-fro" migration can make migratory species especially vulnerable to habitat loss, and substantially affect the results of conservation prioritizations. Species characterized by more erratic or nomadic movements are very difficult to protect through current conservation planning techniques, which typically view species distributions as static. However, collaborations between migration ecologists, conservation planners, and mathematical ecologists are paving the way for improvements in conservation planning for mobile species.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 402
页数:8
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, SPATIAL CONSERVATION
[2]   Mechanistic models of animal migration behaviour their diversity, structure and use [J].
Bauer, Silke ;
Klaassen, Marcel .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2013, 82 (03) :498-508
[3]   Incorporating asymmetric connectivity into spatial decision making for conservation [J].
Beger, Maria ;
Linke, Simon ;
Watts, Matt ;
Game, Eddie ;
Treml, Eric ;
Ball, Ian ;
Possingham, Hugh P. .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2010, 3 (05) :359-368
[4]  
Bengtsson J, 2003, AMBIO, V32, P389, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2003)032[0389:RRADL]2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   Optimism and Challenge for Science-Based Conservation of Migratory Species in and out of U.S. National Parks [J].
Berger, Joel ;
Cain, Steven L. ;
Cheng, Ellen ;
Dratch, Peter ;
Ellison, Kevin ;
Francis, John ;
Frost, Herbert C. ;
Gende, Scott ;
Groves, Craig ;
Karesh, William A. ;
Leslie, Elaine ;
Machlis, Gary ;
Medellin, Rodrigo A. ;
Noss, Reed F. ;
Redford, Kent H. ;
Soukup, Michael ;
Wilcove, David ;
Zack, Steve .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2014, 28 (01) :4-12
[7]   Protecting migration corridors: Challenges and optimism for Mongolian saiga [J].
Berger, Joel ;
Young, Julie K. ;
Berger, Kim Murray .
PLOS BIOLOGY, 2008, 6 (07) :1365-1367
[8]  
Bolger DT, 2008, ECOL LETT, V11, P63
[9]   Migrant-habitat relationships during stopover along an ecological barrier: extrinsic constraints and conservation implications [J].
Buler, Jeffrey J. ;
Moore, Frank R. .
JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY, 2011, 152 :101-112
[10]   Conservation when nothing stands still: moving targets and biodiversity offsets [J].
Bull, Joseph W. ;
Suttle, Kenwyn B. ;
Singh, Navinder J. ;
Milner-Gulland, E. J. .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 11 (04) :203-210