The role of implant surface characteristics in the healing of bone

被引:273
作者
Kieswetter, K [1 ]
Schwartz, Z [1 ]
Dean, DD [1 ]
Boyan, BD [1 ]
机构
[1] OSTEOBIOL INC,SAN ANTONIO,TX
关键词
surface characteristics; wound healing; osteointegration;
D O I
10.1177/10454411960070040301
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
The surface of an implant determines its ultimate ability to integrate into the surrounding tissue. The composite effect of surface energy, composition, roughness, and topography plays a major role during the initial phases of the biological response to the implant, such as protein adsorption and cellular adherence, as well as during the later and more chronic phases of the response. For bone, the successful incorporation (and hence rigid fixation) of an alloplastic material within the surrounding bony bed is called osteointegration. The exact surface characteristics necessary for optimal osteointegration, however, remain to be elucidated. This review will focus on how surface characteristics, such as composition and roughness, affect cellular response to an implant material. Data from two different culture systems suggest that these characteristics play a significant role in the recruitment and maturation of cells along relevant differentiation pathways. In the case of osteointegration, if the implant surface is inappropriate or less than optimal, cells will be unable to produce the appropriate complement of autocrine and paracrine factors required for adequate stimulation of osteogenesis at the implant site. In contrast, if the surface is appropriate, cells al the implant surface will stimulate interactions between cells at the surface and those in distal tissues. This, in turn, will initiate a timely sequence of events which include cell proliferation, differentiation, matrix synthesis, and local factor production, thereby resulting in the successful incorporation of the implant into the surrounding bony tissue.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 345
页数:17
相关论文
共 121 条
[1]
OSSEOINTEGRATED TITANIUM IMPLANTS - REQUIREMENTS FOR ENSURING A LONG-LASTING, DIRECT BONE-TO-IMPLANT ANCHORAGE IN MAN [J].
ALBREKTSSON, T ;
BRANEMARK, PI ;
HANSSON, HA ;
LINDSTROM, J .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1981, 52 (02) :155-170
[2]
INTERFACE ANALYSIS OF TITANIUM AND ZIRCONIUM BONE IMPLANTS [J].
ALBREKTSSON, T ;
HANSSON, HA ;
IVARSSON, B .
BIOMATERIALS, 1985, 6 (02) :97-101
[3]
AN ULTRASTRUCTURAL CHARACTERIZATION OF THE INTERFACE BETWEEN BONE AND SPUTTERED TITANIUM OR STAINLESS-STEEL SURFACES [J].
ALBREKTSSON, T ;
HANSSON, HA .
BIOMATERIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :201-205
[4]
[Anonymous], 1971, COMPATIBILITY BIOCER
[5]
[Anonymous], 1959, METALS ENG BONE JOIN
[6]
INTERMITTENT MICROMOTION INHIBITS BONE INGROWTH - TITANIUM IMPLANTS IN RABBITS [J].
ASPENBERG, P ;
GOODMAN, S ;
TOKSVIGLARSEN, S ;
RYD, L ;
ALBREKTSSON, T .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1992, 63 (02) :141-145
[7]
BAIER R E, 1988, Journal of Oral Implantology, V13, P594
[8]
Baier R E, 1988, J Dent Educ, V52, P788
[9]
BEDER DE, 1956, SURGERY, V39, P470
[10]
ANIMAL-CELL SHAPE CHANGES AND GENE-EXPRESSION [J].
BENZEEV, A .
BIOESSAYS, 1991, 13 (05) :207-212