Sensitivity and inter-observer variability for capsule endoscopy image analysis in a cohort of novice readers

被引:25
作者
Chen, Gary C.
Enayati, Pedram
Tran, Tam
Lee-Henderson, Mary
Quan, Clifford
Dulai, Gareth
Arnott, Ian
Sul, James
Jutabha, Rome [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Ctr Small Bowel Dis, Hlth Sci Ctr, David Geffen Sch Med,Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
关键词
capsule endoscopy analysis; small bowel lesions; novice readers; sensitivity;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.v12.i8.1249
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AIM: To determine the performance of novice readers (4(th) year medical students) for detecting capsule endoscopy findings. METHODS: Ten capsule endoscopy cases of small bowel lesions were administered to the readers. Gold standard findings were pre-defined by gastroenterologists. Ten gold standard "targets" were identified among the 10 cases. Readers were given a 30-min overview of Rapid Reader software and instructed to mark any potential areas of abnormalities. A software program was developed using SAS to analyze the thumbnailed findings. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity for detecting the gold standard findings was 80%. As a group, at least 5 out of 10 readers detected each gold standard finding per recording. All the gold standard targets were identified when the readers' results were combined. Incidental finding/false positive rate ranged between 8.2-59.8 per reader. CONCLUSION: A panel of medical students with minimal endoscopic experience can achieve high sensitivity in detecting lesions on capsule endoscopy. A group of novice readers can pre-screen recordings to thumbnail potential areas of small bowel lesions for further review. These thumbnails must be reviewed to determine the clinical relevance. Further studies are ongoing to assess other cohorts. (c) 2006 The WJG Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1249 / 1254
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
A prospective comparison of capsule endoscopy and push enteroscopy in patients with GI bleeding of obscure origin [J].
Adler, DG ;
Knipschield, M ;
Gostout, C .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 59 (04) :492-498
[2]
A randomized trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy for the detection of small-bowel lesions [J].
Appleyard, M ;
Fireman, Z ;
Glukhovsky, A ;
Jacob, H ;
Shreiver, R ;
Kadirkamanathan, S ;
Lavy, A ;
Lewkowicz, S ;
Scapa, E ;
Shofti, R ;
Swain, P ;
Zaretsky, A .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 119 (06) :1431-1438
[3]
Can non-endoscopists screen capsule endoscopies? [J].
Breitinger, A ;
Schembre, D ;
Mergener, K ;
Brandabur, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 97 (09) :S81-S82
[4]
*CONS STAT, 2003, GIV INT C BERL
[5]
A prospective trial comparing small bowel radiographs and video capsule endoscopy for suspected small bowel disease [J].
Costamagna, G ;
Shah, SK ;
Riccioni, ME ;
Foschia, F ;
Mutignani, M ;
Perri, V ;
Vecchioli, A ;
Brizi, MG ;
Picciocchi, A ;
Marano, P .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 123 (04) :999-1005
[6]
Video capsule endoscopy for investigation of obscure results, and gastrointestinal bleeding: Feasibility, interobserver agreement [J].
De Leusse, A ;
Landi, B ;
Edery, J ;
Burtin, P ;
Lecomte, T ;
Seksik, P ;
Bloch, F ;
Jian, R ;
Cellier, C .
ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 37 (07) :617-621
[7]
The first prospective controlled trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy in chronic gastrointestinal bleeding [J].
Ell, C ;
Remke, S ;
May, A ;
Helou, L ;
Henrich, R ;
Mayer, G .
ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 34 (09) :685-689
[8]
Capsule endoscopy: The voyage is fantastic - will it change what we do? [J].
Fleischer, DE .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 56 (03) :452-456
[9]
FRIEDLAND S, 2004, GASTROENTEST ENDOSC, V59, pM1833
[10]
*GIVEN M2A CAPS EN, 2002, VERS 1 0A 1 27 STAND