The additive partitioning of species diversity: recent revival of an old idea

被引:391
作者
Veech, JA [1 ]
Summerville, KS
Crist, TO
Gering, JC
机构
[1] Miami Univ, Dept Zool, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
[2] Truman State Univ, Div Sci, Kirksville, MO 63501 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.990101.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ecologists have traditionally viewed the total species diversity within a set of communities as the product of the average diversity within a community (alpha) and the diversity among the communities (beta). This multiplicative concept of species diversity contrasts with the lesser known idea that alpha- and beta-diversities sum to give the total diversity. This additive partitioning of species diversity is nearly as old as the multiplicative concept, yet ecologists are just now beginning to use additive partitioning to examine patterns of species diversity. In this review we discuss why additive partitioning remained "hidden" until just a few years ago. The rediscovery of additive partitioning has expanded the way in which ecologists define and measure beta-diversity. Beta diversity is no longer relegated to describing change only along all environmental gradient. Through additive partitioning, beta-diversity is explicitly an average amount of diversity just as is a-diversity. We believe that the additive partitioning of diversity into alpha and beta components will continue to become more widely used because it allows for a direct comparison of alpha- and beta-diversities. It also has particular relevance for testing ecological theory concerned with the determinants of species diversity at multiple spatial scales and potential applications ill conservation biology.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 9
页数:7
相关论文
共 51 条
[21]  
Haydon Daniel, 1993, P117
[22]   INSULAR BIOGEOGRAPHY OF VERNAL POOLS IN THE CENTRAL VALLEY OF CALIFORNIA [J].
HOLLAND, RF ;
JAIN, SK .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1981, 117 (01) :24-37
[24]  
Levins R, 1968, EVOLUTION CHANGING E, P10
[25]  
Lewontin RC., 1972, EVOLUTIONARY BIOL, P381, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4684-9063-3_14
[26]   Are communities saturated?: On the relationship between α, β and γ diversity [J].
Loreau, M .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2000, 3 (02) :73-76
[27]   SEASONAL, SUCCESSIONAL, AND VERTICAL SEGREGATION IN A MARYLAND ANT COMMUNITY [J].
LYNCH, JF .
OIKOS, 1981, 37 (02) :183-198
[28]   ON RELATION BETWEEN HABITAT SELECTION AND SPECIES DIVERSITY [J].
MACARTHUR, R ;
RECHER, H ;
CODY, M .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1966, 100 (913) :319-+
[29]   ON BIRD SPECIES-DIVERSITY [J].
MACARTHUR, R ;
MACARTHUR, JW .
ECOLOGY, 1961, 42 (03) :594-&
[30]   ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS AFFECTING BIRD SPECIES DIVERSITY [J].
MACARTHUR, RH .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1964, 98 (903) :387-397