Rural household vulnerability to climate risk in Uganda

被引:40
作者
Cooper, Sarah Jane [1 ]
Wheeler, Tim [2 ]
机构
[1] Belgrave Farm Cottage, Wrexham Rd, Chester CH4 9DH, Cheshire, England
[2] NERC, Sci & Innovat, Polaris House,North Star Ave, Swindon SN2 1EU, Wilts, England
关键词
Vulnerability; Adaptive capacity; Livelihoods; Climate risk; Uganda; COPING STRATEGIES; LIVELIHOOD VULNERABILITY; AGRICULTURAL ADAPTATION; FARMERS PERCEPTIONS; ADAPTIVE CAPACITY; VARIABILITY; AFRICA; RAINFALL; DROUGHT; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/s10113-016-1049-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Vulnerability assessment is fundamental for informing adaptation to climate change policy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the vulnerability of rural subsistence farmers in Uganda to climate risk. A mixed methods approach used semi-structured and guided interviews, and participatory techniques to explore perception, livelihood response and socio-economic status. Perception of climate risk varied, with wealthier farmers perceiving drought as highest risk, whilst poorer farmers perceived extreme heavy rainfall. Farmers implemented many general livelihood coping and anticipatory responses (54.7 %) to perceived impacts from drought, rainfall variability and extreme heavy rainfall. Examples included food storage, livestock maintenance and planting drought-resistant varieties. Other responses (45.3 %) were specific to individual climatic events, and farmers had no response to cope with rainfall variability. Climate risk was not the only driver of vulnerability. Soil infertility, pests and diseases, and economic instability also sustained decreasing trends in income. Adaptive capacity of households differed with external and internal attributes of sensitivity. Farmers with more land, education, access to governmental extension, a non-farm livelihood, larger households and older age had more capacity to buffer shock through increased assets and entitlements than poorer farmers who were more likely to engage in opportunistic behaviour like casual labouring. Few livelihood responses associated with perceived threat from the climate indicating response to a broader range of stressors. Conclusions determined inequality in livelihood response as a fundamental driver in households' ability to cope and adapt to climate risk.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 663
页数:15
相关论文
共 90 条
  • [1] Exploring poverty traps and social exclusion in South Africa using qualitative and quantitative data
    Adato, M
    Carter, MR
    May, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2006, 42 (02) : 226 - 247
  • [2] Adger W.N., 2006, Fairness in adaptation to climate change, P1, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/2957.003.0004
  • [3] Adger WN, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P717
  • [4] Vulnerability
    Adger, W. Neil
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2006, 16 (03): : 268 - 281
  • [5] Adger WN, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P112, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1666, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1666]
  • [6] Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change?
    Adger, W. Neil
    Dessai, Suraje
    Goulden, Marisa
    Hulme, Mike
    Lorenzoni, Irene
    Nelson, Donald R.
    Naess, Lars Otto
    Wolf, Johanna
    Wreford, Anita
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2009, 93 (3-4) : 335 - 354
  • [7] Adger W. Neil., 1999, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, V4, P253, DOI [10.1023/a:1009601904210, DOI 10.1023/A:1009601904210, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009601904210]
  • [8] The effect of ambiguous risk, and coordination on farmers' adaptation to climate change - A framed field experiment
    Alpizar, Francisco
    Carlsson, Fredrik
    Naranjo, Maria A.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 70 (12) : 2317 - 2326
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2008, CLIM CHANG FOOD SEC
  • [10] Livelihood adaptations to climate variability: insights from farming households in Ghana
    Antwi-Agyei, Philip
    Stringer, Lindsay C.
    Dougill, Andrew J.
    [J]. REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2014, 14 (04) : 1615 - 1626