Rural household vulnerability to climate risk in Uganda

被引:40
作者
Cooper, Sarah Jane [1 ]
Wheeler, Tim [2 ]
机构
[1] Belgrave Farm Cottage, Wrexham Rd, Chester CH4 9DH, Cheshire, England
[2] NERC, Sci & Innovat, Polaris House,North Star Ave, Swindon SN2 1EU, Wilts, England
关键词
Vulnerability; Adaptive capacity; Livelihoods; Climate risk; Uganda; COPING STRATEGIES; LIVELIHOOD VULNERABILITY; AGRICULTURAL ADAPTATION; FARMERS PERCEPTIONS; ADAPTIVE CAPACITY; VARIABILITY; AFRICA; RAINFALL; DROUGHT; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/s10113-016-1049-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Vulnerability assessment is fundamental for informing adaptation to climate change policy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the vulnerability of rural subsistence farmers in Uganda to climate risk. A mixed methods approach used semi-structured and guided interviews, and participatory techniques to explore perception, livelihood response and socio-economic status. Perception of climate risk varied, with wealthier farmers perceiving drought as highest risk, whilst poorer farmers perceived extreme heavy rainfall. Farmers implemented many general livelihood coping and anticipatory responses (54.7 %) to perceived impacts from drought, rainfall variability and extreme heavy rainfall. Examples included food storage, livestock maintenance and planting drought-resistant varieties. Other responses (45.3 %) were specific to individual climatic events, and farmers had no response to cope with rainfall variability. Climate risk was not the only driver of vulnerability. Soil infertility, pests and diseases, and economic instability also sustained decreasing trends in income. Adaptive capacity of households differed with external and internal attributes of sensitivity. Farmers with more land, education, access to governmental extension, a non-farm livelihood, larger households and older age had more capacity to buffer shock through increased assets and entitlements than poorer farmers who were more likely to engage in opportunistic behaviour like casual labouring. Few livelihood responses associated with perceived threat from the climate indicating response to a broader range of stressors. Conclusions determined inequality in livelihood response as a fundamental driver in households' ability to cope and adapt to climate risk.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 663
页数:15
相关论文
共 90 条
  • [81] Rainfall variability and household coping strategies in northern Tanzania: a motivation for district-level strategies
    Traerup, Sara L. M.
    Mertz, Ole
    [J]. REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2011, 11 (03) : 471 - 481
  • [82] Views from the vulnerable: Understanding climatic and other stressors in the Sahel
    Tschakert, Petra
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2007, 17 (3-4): : 381 - 396
  • [83] Social vulnerability in three high-poverty climate change hot spots: What does the climate change literature tell us?
    Tucker, Josephine
    Daoud, Mona
    Oates, Naomi
    Few, Roger
    Conway, Declan
    Mtisi, Sobona
    Matheson, Shirley
    [J]. REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2015, 15 (05) : 783 - 800
  • [84] Vuylsteke D., 1993, African Crop Science Journal, V1, P1
  • [85] An overview of climate change vulnerability: a bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science database
    Wang, Bing
    Pan, Su-Yan
    Ke, Ruo-Yu
    Wang, Ke
    Wei, Yi-Ming
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2014, 74 (03) : 1649 - 1666
  • [86] Local perceptions and regional climate trends on the central plateau of Burkina Faso
    West, C. T.
    Roncoli, C.
    Ouattara, F.
    [J]. LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 19 (03) : 289 - 304
  • [87] Climate Change Impacts on Global Food Security
    Wheeler, Tim
    von Braun, Joachim
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2013, 341 (6145) : 508 - 513
  • [88] Smallholder farmer cropping decisions related to climate variability across multiple regions
    Wood, Stephen A.
    Jina, Amir S.
    Jain, Meha
    Kristjanson, Patti
    DeFries, Ruth S.
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2014, 25 : 163 - 172
  • [89] Yin R.K., 1989, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, V5
  • [90] You C., 2006, 200616 DIIS DAN INT