Immunological monitoring of cancer vaccine therapy

被引:22
作者
Nagorsen, D [1 ]
Scheibenbogen, C [1 ]
Thiel, E [1 ]
Keilholz, U [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Klin 3, D-12200 Berlin, Germany
关键词
antigen; ELISPOT assay; flow cytometry; T cell response; tetramer;
D O I
10.1517/14712598.4.10.1677
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Immunological treatment of malignant diseases in humans aiming at the induction and proliferation of antigen-specific T cells has made rapid progress in recent years. A growing number of tumour-associated antigens, potentially synergistic combinations with adjuvants, and various routes of application provide new opportunities for cancer vaccination. Therefore, a highly accurate assessment of vaccine-induced T cell responses is required. Three T cell assays (tetramers, intracellular cytokine flow cytometry and ELISPOT assay) have emerged as first-line methods for monitoring T cell induction during vaccination. These assays are relatively easy to perform, reliable, sensitive and allow an ex vivo T cell analysis at the single cell level. Although at this stage assays are not a defined surrogate marker for clinical efficacy, they already provide information concerning the immunological potency of a given vaccine. In particular, comparing immune responses under various treatment conditions will help to develop more clinically efficient tumour vaccination. Novel assays, such as CD107 staining, human leukocyte antigen/green fluorescent protein-antigen-presenting cells or microarrays, and assays determining functions, such as proliferation assays, are beginning to complement first-line monitoring assays.
引用
收藏
页码:1677 / 1684
页数:8
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Phenotypic analysis of antigen-specific T lymphocytes [J].
Altman, JD ;
Moss, PAH ;
Goulder, PJR ;
Barouch, DH ;
McHeyzerWilliams, MG ;
Bell, JI ;
McMichael, AJ ;
Davis, MM .
SCIENCE, 1996, 274 (5284) :94-96
[2]  
Altman JD, 1998, SCIENCE, V280, P1821
[3]   Memory CD8+ T cells vary in differentiation phenotype in different persistent virus infections [J].
Appay, V ;
Dunbar, PR ;
Callan, M ;
Klenerman, P ;
Gillespie, GMA ;
Papagno, L ;
Ogg, GS ;
King, A ;
Lechner, F ;
Spina, CA ;
Little, S ;
Havlir, DV ;
Richman, DD ;
Gruener, N ;
Pape, G ;
Waters, A ;
Easterbrook, P ;
Salio, M ;
Cerundolo, V ;
McMichael, AJ ;
Rowland-Jones, SL .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2002, 8 (04) :379-385
[4]   Flow cytometric determination of intracellular or secreted IFNγ for the quantification of antigen reactive T cells [J].
Asemissen, AM ;
Nagorsen, D ;
Keilholz, U ;
Letsch, A ;
Schmittel, A ;
Thiel, E ;
Scheibenbogen, C .
JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS, 2001, 251 (1-2) :101-108
[5]  
Assenmacher M, 1998, EUR J IMMUNOL, V28, P1534, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199805)28:05<1534::AID-IMMU1534>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-R
[7]  
Banchereau J, 2001, CANCER RES, V61, P6451
[8]   Vaccination of metastatic melanoma patients with autologous tumor-derived heat shock protein gp96-peptide complexes:: Clinical and immunologic findings [J].
Belli, F ;
Testori, A ;
Rivoltini, L ;
Maio, M ;
Andreola, G ;
Sertoli, MR ;
Gallino, G ;
Piris, A ;
Cattelan, A ;
Lazzari, I ;
Carrabba, M ;
Scita, G ;
Santantonio, C ;
Pilla, L ;
Tragni, G ;
Lombardo, C ;
Arienti, F ;
Marchianò, A ;
Queirolo, P ;
Bertolini, F ;
Cova, A ;
Lamaj, E ;
Ascani, L ;
Camerini, R ;
Corsi, M ;
Cascinelli, N ;
Lewis, JJ ;
Srivastava, P ;
Parmiani, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (20) :4169-4180
[9]   Sensitive and viable identification of antigen-specific CD8+T cells by a flow cytometric assay for degranulation [J].
Betts, MR ;
Brenchley, JM ;
Price, DA ;
De Rosa, SC ;
Douek, DC ;
Roederer, M ;
Koup, RA .
JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS, 2003, 281 (1-2) :65-78
[10]   Immunosurveillance against cancer and immunotherapy - Synergy or antagonism? [J].
Boon, T ;
van Baren, N .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 348 (03) :252-254