Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT)

被引:874
作者
Brown, MJ
Palmer, CR
Castaigne, A
de Leeuw, PW
Mancia, G
Rosenthal, T
Ruilope, LM
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Clin Pharmacol Unit, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Ctr Appl Med Stat, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ Paris, Hop Henri Mondor, Serv Cardiol, Paris, France
[4] Univ Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Univ Milan, Cattedra Med Interna, Milan, Italy
[6] Tel Aviv Univ, Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Hypertens Unit, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[7] Univ Madrid, Hosp 12 Octubre, Dept Nephrol, Madrid 3, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02527-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The efficacy of antihypertensive drugs newer than diuretics and beta-blockers has not been established. We compared the effects of the calcium-channel blocker nifedipine once daily with the diuretic combination co-amilozide on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients with hypertension. Methods We did a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial in Europe and Israel in 6321 patients aged 55-80 years with hypertension (blood pressure greater than or equal to 150/95 mm Hg, or greater than or equal to 160 mm Hg systolic). Patients had at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor. We randomly assigned patients nifedipine 30 mg in a long-acting gastrointestinal-transport-system (GITS) formulation (n=3157), or co-amilozide (hydrochlorothiazide 25 mu g plus amiloride 2.5 mg; n=3164). Dose titration was by dose doubling, and addition of atenolol 25-50 mg or enalapril 5-10 mg. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, heart failure, or stroke. Analysis was done by intention to treat. Findings Primary outcomes occurred in 200 (6.3%) patients in the nifedipine group and in 182 (5.8%) in the co-amilozide group (18.2 vs 16.5 events per 1000 patient-years; relative risk 1.10 [95% CI 0.91-1.34], p=0.35). Overall mean blood pressure fell from 173/99 mm Hg (SD 14/8) to 138/82 mm Hg (12/7). There was an 8% excess of withdrawals from the nifedipine group because of peripheral oedema (725 vs 518, p<0.0001), but serious adverse events were more frequent in the co-amilozide group (880 vs 796, p=0.02). Deaths were mainly non-vascular (nifedipine 176 vs co-amilozide 172; p=0.81). 80% of the primary events occurred in patients receiving randomised treatment (157 nifedipine, 147 co-amilozide, difference 0.33% [-0.7 to 1.4]). Interpretation Nifedipine once daily and co-amilozide were equally effective in preventing overall cardiovascular or cerebrovascular complications. The choice of drug can be decided by tolerability and blood-pressure response rather than long-term safety or efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 372
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [11] Changes in estimated coronary risk in the 1980s: data from 38 populations in the WHO MONICA Project
    Dobson, AJ
    Evans, A
    Ferrario, M
    Kuulasmaa, KA
    Moltchanov, VA
    Sans, S
    Tunstall-Pedoe, H
    Tuomilehto, JO
    Wedel, H
    Yarnell, J
    [J]. ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 1998, 30 (02) : 199 - 205
  • [12] Furberg CD, 2000, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V283, P1967
  • [13] NIFEDIPINE - DOSE-RELATED INCREASE IN MORTALITY IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY HEART-DISEASE
    FURBERG, CD
    PSATY, BM
    MEYER, JV
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1995, 92 (05) : 1326 - 1331
  • [14] Shanghai trial of nifedipine in the elderly (STONE)
    Gong, LS
    Zhang, WZ
    Zhu, YJ
    Zhu, JR
    Kong, DW
    Page, V
    Ghadirian, P
    LeLorier, J
    Hamet, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1996, 14 (10) : 1237 - 1245
  • [15] Hypertension and antihypertensive therapy as risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Gress, TW
    Nieto, FJ
    Shahar, E
    Wofford, MR
    Brancati, FL
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (13) : 905 - 912
  • [16] Gueyffier F, 1999, LANCET, V353, P1795, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)75892-X
  • [17] Effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition compared with conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension:: the Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP) randomised trial
    Hansson, L
    Lindholm, LH
    Niskanen, L
    Lanke, J
    Hedner, T
    Niklason, A
    Luomanmäki, K
    Dahlöf, B
    de Faire, U
    Mörlin, C
    Karlberg, BE
    Wester, PO
    Björck, JE
    [J]. LANCET, 1999, 353 (9153) : 611 - 616
  • [18] Randomised trial of old and new antihypertensive drugs in elderly patients:: cardiovascular mortality and morbidity the Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension-2 study
    Hansson, L
    Lindholm, LH
    Ekbom, T
    Dahlöf, B
    Lanke, J
    Scherstén, B
    Wester, PO
    Hedner, T
    de Faire, U
    [J]. LANCET, 1999, 354 (9192) : 1751 - 1756
  • [19] Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension:: principal results of the hypertension optimal treatment (HOT) randomised trial
    Hansson, L
    Zanchetti, A
    Carruthers, SG
    Dahlöf, B
    Elmfeldt, D
    Julius, S
    Ménard, J
    Rahn, KH
    Wedel, H
    Westerling, S
    [J]. LANCET, 1998, 351 (9118) : 1755 - 1762
  • [20] Estimation of contribution of changes in classic risk factors to trends in coronary-event rates across the WHO MONICA Project populations
    Kuulasmaa, K
    Tunstall-Pedoe, H
    Dobson, A
    Fortmann, S
    Sans, S
    Tolonen, H
    Evans, A
    Ferrario, M
    Tuomilehto, J
    [J]. LANCET, 2000, 355 (9205) : 675 - 687