Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: A review of methods and observations

被引:1652
作者
Hanson, PJ
Edwards, NT
Garten, CT
Andrews, JA
机构
[1] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Div Environm Sci, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Bot, Durham, NC 27708 USA
关键词
rhizosphere; root respiration; soil CO2 efflux; soil respiration;
D O I
10.1023/A:1006244819642
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Forest soil respiration is the sum of heterotrophic (microbes, soil fauna) and autotrophic (root) respiration. The contribution of each group needs to be understood to evaluate implications of environmental change on soil carbon cycling and sequestration. Three primary methods have been used to distinguish hetero- versus autotrophic soil respiration including: integration of components contributing to in situ forest soil CO2 efflux (i.e., litter, roots, soil), comparison of soils with and without root exclusion, and application of stable or radioactive isotope methods. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages, but isotope based methods provide quantitative answers with the least amount of disturbance to the soil and roots. Published data from all methods indicate that root/rhizosphere respiration can account for as little as 10 percent to greater than 90 percent of total in situ soil respiration depending on vegetation type and season of the year. Studies which have integrated percent root contribution to total soil respiration throughout an entire year or growing season show mean values of 45.8 and 60.4 percent for forest and nonforest vegetation, respectively. Such average annual values must be extrapolated with caution, however, because the root contribution to total soil respiration is commonly higher during the growing season and lower during the dormant periods of the year.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 146
页数:32
相关论文
共 124 条
[51]   C-14 ALLOCATION IN TREE SOIL SYSTEMS [J].
HORWATH, WR ;
PREGITZER, KS ;
PAUL, EA .
TREE PHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 14 (10) :1163-1176
[52]   DIURNAL VARIATION IN ROOT RESPIRATION [J].
HUCK, MG ;
HAGEMAN, RH ;
HANSON, JB .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1962, 37 (03) :371-&
[53]   The fate of carbon in grasslands under carbon dioxide enrichment [J].
Hungate, BA ;
Holland, EA ;
Jackson, RB ;
Chapin, FS ;
Mooney, HA ;
Field, CB .
NATURE, 1997, 388 (6642) :576-579
[54]  
*IPCC, 1996, CIM CHANG 1995 IMP A
[55]   THE ROTHAMSTED LONG-TERM EXPERIMENTS - ARE THEY STILL OF USE [J].
JENKINSON, DS .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1991, 83 (01) :2-10
[56]   MODEL ESTIMATES OF CO2 EMISSIONS FROM SOIL IN RESPONSE TO GLOBAL WARMING [J].
JENKINSON, DS ;
ADAMS, DE ;
WILD, A .
NATURE, 1991, 351 (6324) :304-306
[57]   RHIZODEPOSITION BY (CO2)-C-14-PULSE-LABELED SPRING BARLEY GROWN IN SMALL-FIELD PLOTS ON SANDY LOAM [J].
JENSEN, B .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1993, 25 (11) :1553-1559
[58]   Soil surface CO2 flux as an index of soil respiration in situ: A comparison of two chamber methods [J].
Jensen, LS ;
Mueller, T ;
Tate, KR ;
Ross, DJ ;
Magid, J ;
Nielsen, NE .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1996, 28 (10-11) :1297-1306
[59]   SOIL PCO(2), SOIL RESPIRATION, AND ROOT ACTIVITY IN CO2-FUMIGATED AND NITROGEN-FERTILIZED PONDEROSA PINE [J].
JOHNSON, D ;
GEISINGER, D ;
WALKER, R ;
NEWMAN, J ;
VOSE, J ;
ELLIOT, K ;
BALL, T .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1994, 165 (01) :129-138
[60]  
JOHNSON MG, 1991, EPA600391031