Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing

被引:491
作者
Mondloch, CJ [1 ]
Le Grand, R [1 ]
Maurer, D [1 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Psychol, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1068/p3339
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Expertise in face processing takes many years to develop. To determine the contribution of different face-processing skills to this slow development, we altered a single face so as to create sets of faces designed to measure featural, configural, and contour processing. Within each set, faces differed only in the shape of the eyes and mouth (featural set), only in the spacing of the eyes and mouth (spacing set), or only in the shape of the external contour (contour set). We presented adults, and children aged 6, 8, and 10 years, with pairs of upright and inverted faces and instructed them to indicate whether the two faces were the same or different. Adults showed a larger inversion effect for the spacing set than for the featural and external contour sets, confirming that the spacing set taps configural processing. On the spacing set, all groups of children made more errors than adults. In contrast, on the external contour and featural sets, children at all ages were almost as accurate as adults, with no significant difference beginning at age 6 on the external contour set and beginning at age 10 on the featural set. Overall, the results indicate that adult expertise in configural processing is especially slow to develop.
引用
收藏
页码:553 / 566
页数:14
相关论文
共 44 条
[11]  
Carey S., 1994, VIS COGN, V1, P253, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13506289408402302, 10.1080/13506289408402302]
[12]   Do 7-month-old infants process independent features or facial configurations? [J].
Cohen, LB ;
Cashon, CH .
INFANT AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 10 (1-2) :83-92
[13]   Featural and configurational processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity [J].
Collishaw, SM ;
Hole, GJ .
PERCEPTION, 2000, 29 (08) :893-909
[14]   Do the right and left hemispheres attend to the same visuospatial information within a face in infancy? [J].
Deruelle, C ;
de Schonen, S .
DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 14 (04) :535-554
[15]   WHY FACES ARE AND ARE NOT SPECIAL - AN EFFECT OF EXPERTISE [J].
DIAMOND, R ;
CAREY, S .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1986, 115 (02) :107-117
[16]   IDENTIFICATION OF FAMILIAR AND UNFAMILIAR FACES FROM INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL FEATURES - SOME IMPLICATIONS FOR THEORIES OF FACE RECOGNITION [J].
ELLIS, HD ;
SHEPHERD, JW ;
DAVIES, GM .
PERCEPTION, 1979, 8 (04) :431-439
[17]  
Farkas L.G., 1981, ANTHROPOMETRY HEAD F
[18]   The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence [J].
Freire, A ;
Lee, K ;
Symons, LA .
PERCEPTION, 2000, 29 (02) :159-170
[19]   Face recognition in 4- to 7-year-olds: Processing of configural, featural, and paraphernalia information [J].
Freire, A ;
Lee, K .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 80 (04) :347-371
[20]   Becoming a ''greeble'' expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition [J].
Gauthier, I ;
Tarr, MJ .
VISION RESEARCH, 1997, 37 (12) :1673-1682